评估对方差分析中相互作用概念的理解

Katy Green
{"title":"评估对方差分析中相互作用概念的理解","authors":"Katy Green","doi":"10.52041/srap.07603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students have difficulty understanding the concept of interaction in analysis of variance, implications of the presence of a significant interaction for interpretation of main effects, and appropriate follow-up procedures. While grasping computational procedures and how to get software to generate the appropriate terms, interpretation and communication of results poses a challenge. In this paper exercises for teaching interpretation of interaction are presented. The context was an anova course designed for doctoral students in a college of education. These students are typically interested in substantive research areas such as counseling or educational administration, so the course is applied in nature. The approach taken to teaching interaction was scaffolding or layering of skills. Students first listened to explanations and examples of what interaction is and answered multiple choice questions oriented to comprehension and application outside of class. They then worked in small groups in class to calculate interaction terms both by hand and using statistical software. Next students wrote both technical summaries of results suitable for submission to a journal and one-paragraph “press releases,” both of which were critiqued by the course instructor and graduate teaching assistant. These exercises were standard across students and were highly structured. Students then received different data sets and were asked to repeat the analysis, technical, and brief write-up of results for the new data as a homework exercise. The “press releases” were the basis of 5-minute in-class presentations done to encourage verbal communication of results. After the presentation, classmates were given a 3-item quiz about their understanding of the results just presented. The quiz responses were used as feedback to the presenter about the effectiveness of their communication. Successes and failures of this approach are discussed as are thoughts about future directions in teaching about interaction.","PeriodicalId":148864,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Student Leaning In Statistics IASE Satellite Conference","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing understanding of the concept of interaction in analysis of variance\",\"authors\":\"Katy Green\",\"doi\":\"10.52041/srap.07603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students have difficulty understanding the concept of interaction in analysis of variance, implications of the presence of a significant interaction for interpretation of main effects, and appropriate follow-up procedures. While grasping computational procedures and how to get software to generate the appropriate terms, interpretation and communication of results poses a challenge. In this paper exercises for teaching interpretation of interaction are presented. The context was an anova course designed for doctoral students in a college of education. These students are typically interested in substantive research areas such as counseling or educational administration, so the course is applied in nature. The approach taken to teaching interaction was scaffolding or layering of skills. Students first listened to explanations and examples of what interaction is and answered multiple choice questions oriented to comprehension and application outside of class. They then worked in small groups in class to calculate interaction terms both by hand and using statistical software. Next students wrote both technical summaries of results suitable for submission to a journal and one-paragraph “press releases,” both of which were critiqued by the course instructor and graduate teaching assistant. These exercises were standard across students and were highly structured. Students then received different data sets and were asked to repeat the analysis, technical, and brief write-up of results for the new data as a homework exercise. The “press releases” were the basis of 5-minute in-class presentations done to encourage verbal communication of results. After the presentation, classmates were given a 3-item quiz about their understanding of the results just presented. The quiz responses were used as feedback to the presenter about the effectiveness of their communication. Successes and failures of this approach are discussed as are thoughts about future directions in teaching about interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Student Leaning In Statistics IASE Satellite Conference\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Student Leaning In Statistics IASE Satellite Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.07603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Student Leaning In Statistics IASE Satellite Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.07603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

学生很难理解方差分析中相互作用的概念,解释主要效应时存在的重要相互作用的含义,以及适当的后续程序。在掌握计算程序和如何让软件生成适当的术语的同时,结果的解释和交流构成了一个挑战。本文提出了互动口译教学的练习方法。背景是一门为教育学院的博士生设计的方差分析课程。这些学生通常对咨询或教育管理等实质性研究领域感兴趣,因此课程本质上是应用型的。教授互动的方法是脚手架或技能分层。学生们首先听了互动的解释和例子,并在课外回答了以理解和应用为导向的多项选择题。然后,他们在课堂上分成小组,用手工和统计软件计算交互项。接下来,学生们写了适合提交给期刊的技术摘要和一段“新闻稿”,这两份报告都由课程导师和研究生助教进行评审。这些练习对学生来说是标准的,并且是高度结构化的。然后,学生们收到不同的数据集,并被要求重复新数据的分析、技术和简短的结果记录,作为家庭作业。“新闻稿”是5分钟课堂演示的基础,目的是鼓励口头交流结果。演讲结束后,同学们被要求做一个三题测试,测试他们对刚刚展示的结果的理解。测验的回答被用来作为对演讲者沟通有效性的反馈。讨论了这种方法的成功和失败,并对互动教学的未来方向进行了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing understanding of the concept of interaction in analysis of variance
Students have difficulty understanding the concept of interaction in analysis of variance, implications of the presence of a significant interaction for interpretation of main effects, and appropriate follow-up procedures. While grasping computational procedures and how to get software to generate the appropriate terms, interpretation and communication of results poses a challenge. In this paper exercises for teaching interpretation of interaction are presented. The context was an anova course designed for doctoral students in a college of education. These students are typically interested in substantive research areas such as counseling or educational administration, so the course is applied in nature. The approach taken to teaching interaction was scaffolding or layering of skills. Students first listened to explanations and examples of what interaction is and answered multiple choice questions oriented to comprehension and application outside of class. They then worked in small groups in class to calculate interaction terms both by hand and using statistical software. Next students wrote both technical summaries of results suitable for submission to a journal and one-paragraph “press releases,” both of which were critiqued by the course instructor and graduate teaching assistant. These exercises were standard across students and were highly structured. Students then received different data sets and were asked to repeat the analysis, technical, and brief write-up of results for the new data as a homework exercise. The “press releases” were the basis of 5-minute in-class presentations done to encourage verbal communication of results. After the presentation, classmates were given a 3-item quiz about their understanding of the results just presented. The quiz responses were used as feedback to the presenter about the effectiveness of their communication. Successes and failures of this approach are discussed as are thoughts about future directions in teaching about interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信