科学项目-计划管理工具的有效性

V. Tambovtsev
{"title":"科学项目-计划管理工具的有效性","authors":"V. Tambovtsev","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented analysis of scientific research planning practices, as well as international experience in covering projects and programs of the entire state administration, leads to the conclusion that in science, project-program methods can be efficient and cost-effective only for a limited range of tasks. These methods should be combined with exploratory, non-project research necessary to identify and compare work options that can lead to one or another significant practical results. Without such a combination, the range of practical problems solved by project-program methods can be significantly reduced after a certain period of neglect of exploratory research.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Project-program Management Tools at the Science\",\"authors\":\"V. Tambovtsev\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presented analysis of scientific research planning practices, as well as international experience in covering projects and programs of the entire state administration, leads to the conclusion that in science, project-program methods can be efficient and cost-effective only for a limited range of tasks. These methods should be combined with exploratory, non-project research necessary to identify and compare work options that can lead to one or another significant practical results. Without such a combination, the range of practical problems solved by project-program methods can be significantly reduced after a certain period of neglect of exploratory research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对科研规划实践的分析,以及涵盖整个国家行政部门的项目和计划的国际经验,得出的结论是,在科学领域,项目-计划方法只能在有限的任务范围内有效和具有成本效益。这些方法应与必要的探索性、非项目研究相结合,以确定和比较可能导致一个或另一个重大实际结果的工作选择。如果没有这样的结合,在一段时间内忽视探索性研究后,项目-计划方法解决的实际问题的范围可能会大大缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Project-program Management Tools at the Science
The presented analysis of scientific research planning practices, as well as international experience in covering projects and programs of the entire state administration, leads to the conclusion that in science, project-program methods can be efficient and cost-effective only for a limited range of tasks. These methods should be combined with exploratory, non-project research necessary to identify and compare work options that can lead to one or another significant practical results. Without such a combination, the range of practical problems solved by project-program methods can be significantly reduced after a certain period of neglect of exploratory research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信