贝叶斯信念网络的相关故障分析

M. Fam, D. Konovessis, Xuhong He, L. S. Ong, H. K. Tan
{"title":"贝叶斯信念网络的相关故障分析","authors":"M. Fam, D. Konovessis, Xuhong He, L. S. Ong, H. K. Tan","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-95853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fault trees (FT) and event trees (ET) have been used thoroughly in risk analysis and there have been a few published articles outlining how to map FTs and ETs to Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN). There have been documented benefits of a BBN being able to consider Common Cause Failures (CCF) and conditional dependencies. With modelling CCFs in a BBN, there is a possibility to increase the level of analysis of a CCF by breaking down the analysis to the respective CCF Categories, such as Environment, Maintenance or Design. This allows a better understanding of the contributing events given a defined accident scenario. Also, in the decommissioning industry, there is no established database yet for CCF of components, as decommissioning projects are sparse and spread out across different operating conditions. Hence it may be practical to adjust generic CCFs to obtain facility-specific parameters for common cause failures. The paper thus highlights how to express CCFs with a Beta-Factor Model in a BBN and by extension, undertake an extended level of analysis according to CCF categories and adjust generic database common cause factors to a facility-specific factor based on a checklist. The technique is applied to a risk analysis of a well plugging and abandonment event.","PeriodicalId":314553,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing Dependent Failures in a Bayesian Belief Network\",\"authors\":\"M. Fam, D. Konovessis, Xuhong He, L. S. Ong, H. K. Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2019-95853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Fault trees (FT) and event trees (ET) have been used thoroughly in risk analysis and there have been a few published articles outlining how to map FTs and ETs to Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN). There have been documented benefits of a BBN being able to consider Common Cause Failures (CCF) and conditional dependencies. With modelling CCFs in a BBN, there is a possibility to increase the level of analysis of a CCF by breaking down the analysis to the respective CCF Categories, such as Environment, Maintenance or Design. This allows a better understanding of the contributing events given a defined accident scenario. Also, in the decommissioning industry, there is no established database yet for CCF of components, as decommissioning projects are sparse and spread out across different operating conditions. Hence it may be practical to adjust generic CCFs to obtain facility-specific parameters for common cause failures. The paper thus highlights how to express CCFs with a Beta-Factor Model in a BBN and by extension, undertake an extended level of analysis according to CCF categories and adjust generic database common cause factors to a facility-specific factor based on a checklist. The technique is applied to a risk analysis of a well plugging and abandonment event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

故障树(FT)和事件树(ET)在风险分析中得到了广泛的应用,已有一些文章概述了如何将FT和ET映射到贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)中。有文献证明,BBN能够考虑共因故障(CCF)和条件依赖关系的好处。在生态环境网络中对共同影响因素进行建模,可以通过将分析分解为各自的共同影响因素类别,例如环境、维护或设计,来提高对共同影响因素的分析水平。这样可以更好地理解给定的事故场景下的相关事件。此外,在退役行业,由于退役项目很少,分布在不同的操作条件下,目前还没有建立组件CCF的数据库。因此,调整通用ccf以获得针对常见原因故障的设施特定参数可能是可行的。因此,本文强调了如何在BBN中使用beta因子模型来表达CCF,并通过扩展,根据CCF类别进行扩展级别的分析,并根据清单将通用数据库的共同原因因素调整为设施特定因素。该技术已应用于油井封堵和弃井事件的风险分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing Dependent Failures in a Bayesian Belief Network
Fault trees (FT) and event trees (ET) have been used thoroughly in risk analysis and there have been a few published articles outlining how to map FTs and ETs to Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN). There have been documented benefits of a BBN being able to consider Common Cause Failures (CCF) and conditional dependencies. With modelling CCFs in a BBN, there is a possibility to increase the level of analysis of a CCF by breaking down the analysis to the respective CCF Categories, such as Environment, Maintenance or Design. This allows a better understanding of the contributing events given a defined accident scenario. Also, in the decommissioning industry, there is no established database yet for CCF of components, as decommissioning projects are sparse and spread out across different operating conditions. Hence it may be practical to adjust generic CCFs to obtain facility-specific parameters for common cause failures. The paper thus highlights how to express CCFs with a Beta-Factor Model in a BBN and by extension, undertake an extended level of analysis according to CCF categories and adjust generic database common cause factors to a facility-specific factor based on a checklist. The technique is applied to a risk analysis of a well plugging and abandonment event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信