高校分类与排名之间的复杂相互作用:柏林原则是否也适用于分类?

Alexander C. McCormick
{"title":"高校分类与排名之间的复杂相互作用:柏林原则是否也适用于分类?","authors":"Alexander C. McCormick","doi":"10.1080/03797720802253744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Classification’ and ‘ranking’ are tools for comparing colleges and universities, albeit for different purposes. Although ‘classification’ focuses on identifying similarities rather than ordering institutions, it is closely intertwined with ‘ranking’, whether directly through its content, structure, and procedures, or indirectly through the ways it is used and understood by the wider community of users (e.g., researchers, policymakers, institutional leaders, etc.). For this reason, many of the standards, protocols, and best practices established for ranking systems apply as well to the case of classification. This paper examines the interplay between ‘classification’ and ‘ranking’ in some detail, and applies the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions which were adopted in May 2006 to the case of classification, focusing on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.","PeriodicalId":294207,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education in Europe","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complex Interplay between Classification and Ranking of Colleges and Universities: Should the Berlin Principles Apply Equally to Classification?.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander C. McCormick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03797720802253744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘Classification’ and ‘ranking’ are tools for comparing colleges and universities, albeit for different purposes. Although ‘classification’ focuses on identifying similarities rather than ordering institutions, it is closely intertwined with ‘ranking’, whether directly through its content, structure, and procedures, or indirectly through the ways it is used and understood by the wider community of users (e.g., researchers, policymakers, institutional leaders, etc.). For this reason, many of the standards, protocols, and best practices established for ranking systems apply as well to the case of classification. This paper examines the interplay between ‘classification’ and ‘ranking’ in some detail, and applies the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions which were adopted in May 2006 to the case of classification, focusing on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education in Europe\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802253744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802253744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

“分类”和“排名”是比较学院和大学的工具,尽管目的不同。尽管“分类”侧重于识别相似性,而不是对机构进行排序,但它与“排名”密切相关,无论是直接通过其内容、结构和程序,还是间接通过更广泛的用户群体(如研究人员、政策制定者、机构领导人等)使用和理解的方式。由于这个原因,许多为排名系统建立的标准、协议和最佳实践也适用于分类。本文详细考察了“分类”和“排名”之间的相互作用,并将2006年5月通过的《柏林高等教育机构排名原则》应用于分类,重点研究了卡内基高等教育机构分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Complex Interplay between Classification and Ranking of Colleges and Universities: Should the Berlin Principles Apply Equally to Classification?.
‘Classification’ and ‘ranking’ are tools for comparing colleges and universities, albeit for different purposes. Although ‘classification’ focuses on identifying similarities rather than ordering institutions, it is closely intertwined with ‘ranking’, whether directly through its content, structure, and procedures, or indirectly through the ways it is used and understood by the wider community of users (e.g., researchers, policymakers, institutional leaders, etc.). For this reason, many of the standards, protocols, and best practices established for ranking systems apply as well to the case of classification. This paper examines the interplay between ‘classification’ and ‘ranking’ in some detail, and applies the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions which were adopted in May 2006 to the case of classification, focusing on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信