通过仿真对MANET路由协议进行了比较分析

Callum Brill, Thomas Nash
{"title":"通过仿真对MANET路由协议进行了比较分析","authors":"Callum Brill, Thomas Nash","doi":"10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigate the performance of various mobile ad hoc network routing protocols. We use AODV and DSDV as our baseline as these are two of the most commonly used protocols in reactive and proactive routing, respectively. We compare these with the performance of an ant colony optimization implementation AntHocNet. This protocol works as a hybrid protocol, using both reactive and proactive elements. We implement the simulations across a variety of scenarios using the NS2 network simulator and present our findings.","PeriodicalId":440665,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of MANET routing protocols through simulation\",\"authors\":\"Callum Brill, Thomas Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we investigate the performance of various mobile ad hoc network routing protocols. We use AODV and DSDV as our baseline as these are two of the most commonly used protocols in reactive and proactive routing, respectively. We compare these with the performance of an ant colony optimization implementation AntHocNet. This protocol works as a hybrid protocol, using both reactive and proactive elements. We implement the simulations across a variety of scenarios using the NS2 network simulator and present our findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文研究了各种移动自组织网络路由协议的性能。我们使用AODV和DSDV作为基准,因为它们分别是被动路由和主动路由中最常用的两种协议。我们将这些与蚁群优化实现AntHocNet的性能进行比较。该协议作为混合协议工作,同时使用被动和主动元素。我们使用NS2网络模拟器在各种场景中实现了模拟,并展示了我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of MANET routing protocols through simulation
In this paper we investigate the performance of various mobile ad hoc network routing protocols. We use AODV and DSDV as our baseline as these are two of the most commonly used protocols in reactive and proactive routing, respectively. We compare these with the performance of an ant colony optimization implementation AntHocNet. This protocol works as a hybrid protocol, using both reactive and proactive elements. We implement the simulations across a variety of scenarios using the NS2 network simulator and present our findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信