AL-AḌD DĀ(KONTRANIM)和多样性中的含义解释

Azam Bahtiar
{"title":"AL-AḌD DĀ(KONTRANIM)和多样性中的含义解释","authors":"Azam Bahtiar","doi":"10.20871/tjsq.v4i1.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tries to prove that differences in interpretation of the Al-Qur’an are necessary and inevitable. Even if it we can assume that the reading of the text can be free from ideological intervention and the tendency of commentators, differences in interpretation will still exist. To prove it, the author proposes and examines a linguistic phenomenon known as al-aḍdād or contranym. Using a number of muktabar and standard traditional commentaries, this paper examines six contranym entries that appear in the text of the Al-Qur’an, and shows their implications for differences in interpretation—both differences called tanawwu'ī (variative) and taḍādd (contradictory).","PeriodicalId":105596,"journal":{"name":"Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AL-AḌDĀD (KONTRANIM) DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM PERBEDAAN TAFSIR\",\"authors\":\"Azam Bahtiar\",\"doi\":\"10.20871/tjsq.v4i1.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper tries to prove that differences in interpretation of the Al-Qur’an are necessary and inevitable. Even if it we can assume that the reading of the text can be free from ideological intervention and the tendency of commentators, differences in interpretation will still exist. To prove it, the author proposes and examines a linguistic phenomenon known as al-aḍdād or contranym. Using a number of muktabar and standard traditional commentaries, this paper examines six contranym entries that appear in the text of the Al-Qur’an, and shows their implications for differences in interpretation—both differences called tanawwu'ī (variative) and taḍādd (contradictory).\",\"PeriodicalId\":105596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v4i1.176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v4i1.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图证明对《古兰经》的不同解释是必要的和不可避免的。即使我们可以假设文本的阅读可以不受意识形态干预和评论员倾向的影响,解释上的差异仍然存在。为了证明这一点,作者提出并研究了一种被称为al-aḍdād或contranym的语言现象。本文使用了大量的穆克塔巴尔注释和标准的传统注释,研究了出现在《古兰经》文本中的六个抵触条目,并显示了它们在解释上的差异——这两种差异被称为tanawwu' ' '(变化)和taḍādd(矛盾)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AL-AḌDĀD (KONTRANIM) DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM PERBEDAAN TAFSIR
This paper tries to prove that differences in interpretation of the Al-Qur’an are necessary and inevitable. Even if it we can assume that the reading of the text can be free from ideological intervention and the tendency of commentators, differences in interpretation will still exist. To prove it, the author proposes and examines a linguistic phenomenon known as al-aḍdād or contranym. Using a number of muktabar and standard traditional commentaries, this paper examines six contranym entries that appear in the text of the Al-Qur’an, and shows their implications for differences in interpretation—both differences called tanawwu'ī (variative) and taḍādd (contradictory).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信