{"title":"宗教知识分子、改革与霸权斗争","authors":"Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi","doi":"10.1017/9781108681834.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[E]very contradiction is a con fl ict of value as well as a con fl ict of interest; that inside every “ need ” there is an affect, or “ want ” , on its way to becoming an “ ought ” (and vice versa ); that every class struggle is at the same time a struggle over values. 1 [A]ll political concepts, images, and terms have a polemical meaning. They are focused on a speci fi c con fl ict and are bound to a concrete situation. 2","PeriodicalId":267307,"journal":{"name":"Revolution and Its Discontents","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious Intellectuals, Reform, and the Struggle for Hegemony\",\"authors\":\"Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108681834.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[E]very contradiction is a con fl ict of value as well as a con fl ict of interest; that inside every “ need ” there is an affect, or “ want ” , on its way to becoming an “ ought ” (and vice versa ); that every class struggle is at the same time a struggle over values. 1 [A]ll political concepts, images, and terms have a polemical meaning. They are focused on a speci fi c con fl ict and are bound to a concrete situation. 2\",\"PeriodicalId\":267307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revolution and Its Discontents\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revolution and Its Discontents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681834.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revolution and Its Discontents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681834.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Religious Intellectuals, Reform, and the Struggle for Hegemony
[E]very contradiction is a con fl ict of value as well as a con fl ict of interest; that inside every “ need ” there is an affect, or “ want ” , on its way to becoming an “ ought ” (and vice versa ); that every class struggle is at the same time a struggle over values. 1 [A]ll political concepts, images, and terms have a polemical meaning. They are focused on a speci fi c con fl ict and are bound to a concrete situation. 2