管理软件质量要求

Laura Phillips, A. Aurum, Richard Berntsson-Svensson
{"title":"管理软件质量要求","authors":"Laura Phillips, A. Aurum, Richard Berntsson-Svensson","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2012.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research study explores current quality requirements (QR) management practices in Australian organisations focusing on the elicitation, handling processes, challenges faced, quantification methods used and interdependency management. This research was conducted through six mini case studies, examining organizations that varied in size, structure, industry and function. A mixed methodology was utilised through an online survey for gathering quantitative data and semi-structured interviews for gathering explanatory qualitative data. The results found that five out of the six organisations studied did not have a formal and defined process for the handling of QRs. Large organisations treated QRs are part of their overall project specifications, while smaller organisations saw the management of QRs as more ad hoc. When prioritising QRs, Accuracy was considered the most important priority followed by Security and Reliability. The main challenges that organisations face in their management of QRs is defining and quantifying these requirements.","PeriodicalId":298734,"journal":{"name":"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Software Quality Requirements\",\"authors\":\"Laura Phillips, A. Aurum, Richard Berntsson-Svensson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA.2012.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research study explores current quality requirements (QR) management practices in Australian organisations focusing on the elicitation, handling processes, challenges faced, quantification methods used and interdependency management. This research was conducted through six mini case studies, examining organizations that varied in size, structure, industry and function. A mixed methodology was utilised through an online survey for gathering quantitative data and semi-structured interviews for gathering explanatory qualitative data. The results found that five out of the six organisations studied did not have a formal and defined process for the handling of QRs. Large organisations treated QRs are part of their overall project specifications, while smaller organisations saw the management of QRs as more ad hoc. When prioritising QRs, Accuracy was considered the most important priority followed by Security and Reliability. The main challenges that organisations face in their management of QRs is defining and quantifying these requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2012.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2012.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究探讨了澳大利亚组织当前的质量要求(QR)管理实践,重点是启发、处理过程、面临的挑战、使用的量化方法和相互依赖的管理。这项研究是通过六个小型案例研究进行的,研究了不同规模、结构、行业和功能的组织。通过在线调查收集定量数据和半结构化访谈收集解释性定性数据,采用混合方法。结果发现,在被研究的6个组织中,有5个没有正式和明确的流程来处理质量报告。大型组织将质量报告视为其整体项目规范的一部分,而较小的组织则将质量报告的管理视为更临时的。当排序qr时,准确性被认为是最重要的优先级,其次是安全性和可靠性。组织在质量报告管理中面临的主要挑战是定义和量化这些需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing Software Quality Requirements
This research study explores current quality requirements (QR) management practices in Australian organisations focusing on the elicitation, handling processes, challenges faced, quantification methods used and interdependency management. This research was conducted through six mini case studies, examining organizations that varied in size, structure, industry and function. A mixed methodology was utilised through an online survey for gathering quantitative data and semi-structured interviews for gathering explanatory qualitative data. The results found that five out of the six organisations studied did not have a formal and defined process for the handling of QRs. Large organisations treated QRs are part of their overall project specifications, while smaller organisations saw the management of QRs as more ad hoc. When prioritising QRs, Accuracy was considered the most important priority followed by Security and Reliability. The main challenges that organisations face in their management of QRs is defining and quantifying these requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信