在乌克兰和欧盟一体化背景下,欧盟知识产权保护发展的现代趋势

Y. Kapitsa
{"title":"在乌克兰和欧盟一体化背景下,欧盟知识产权保护发展的现代趋势","authors":"Y. Kapitsa","doi":"10.33731/52022.270779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keywords: protection of intellectual property rights, European Union, integrationof Ukraine and the EU, enforcement of intellectual property, copyright protection \nThe modern development of EU intellectual property law in2017-2022 is studied. The active role of the European Commission in analysing the effectivenessof EU acts and determining plans for the development of the sphere of intellectualproperty in the EU is noted. Attention is drawn to the expediency of usingEuropean Commission documents within the framework of the integration of Ukraineand the EU regarding IP (IP action plan, COM/2020/760 final; IP enforcement system,COM(2017) 707 final; guidance on Directive 2004/48 /EC, COM(2017) 708 final,standard essential patents», COM(2017) 712 final etc; evaluation of design designsprotection, 2020; system of supplementary protection certificate, 2020; geographicalindications protection, 2020 etc.The essential importance of the DSM Directive (EU) 2019/790 with introduction ofa sustainable system of payment the fair remuneration to authors and performers aswell revocation mechanism regarding licence or the transfer of rights where there is alack of exploitation of that work, and the relevance of the implementation of theseprovisions in the legislation of Ukraine are emphasized.It is relevant to take into account the Guidance of the Commission on Directive2004/48/EC, in particular, that the right holder could demand that the damages set asa lump sum are calculated not only because of the single amount of that hypotheticalroyalty/fee, but also based on other appropriate aspects. Regarding Commission evaluationof the Regulations (EC) No. 469/2009 and No. 1610/96 concerning the supplementaryprotection certificate for medicinal products and plant protection products, itis relevant to take into consideration in the legislation of Ukraine not only the provisionsof the specified regulations, but also the decisions of the ECJ on the interpretationof the specified acts. \nRegarding geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products inthe EU-registration of GI for non-agricultural products is possible in Ukraine. However,the activities of the ministries need to be particularly strengthened, consideringthe experience of Poland, Moldova and other countries that envisage support fromgovernment authorities for the identification of promising geographical indications,assistance in creating associations of individuals to submit GI applications and in thepreparation of applications, as well as stimulating activities for the protection of GI.The relevance of the adoption in Ukraine of the Strategy for the Development ofthe Intellectual Property Sphere in Ukraine, which was developed in cooperation withWIPO back in 2019 and contains European oriented guidelines for the development ofthe sphere of intellectual property in Ukraine, is noted.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern trends in the development of protection of intellectual property in the European Union in the context of the integration of Ukraine and the EU\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kapitsa\",\"doi\":\"10.33731/52022.270779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keywords: protection of intellectual property rights, European Union, integrationof Ukraine and the EU, enforcement of intellectual property, copyright protection \\nThe modern development of EU intellectual property law in2017-2022 is studied. The active role of the European Commission in analysing the effectivenessof EU acts and determining plans for the development of the sphere of intellectualproperty in the EU is noted. Attention is drawn to the expediency of usingEuropean Commission documents within the framework of the integration of Ukraineand the EU regarding IP (IP action plan, COM/2020/760 final; IP enforcement system,COM(2017) 707 final; guidance on Directive 2004/48 /EC, COM(2017) 708 final,standard essential patents», COM(2017) 712 final etc; evaluation of design designsprotection, 2020; system of supplementary protection certificate, 2020; geographicalindications protection, 2020 etc.The essential importance of the DSM Directive (EU) 2019/790 with introduction ofa sustainable system of payment the fair remuneration to authors and performers aswell revocation mechanism regarding licence or the transfer of rights where there is alack of exploitation of that work, and the relevance of the implementation of theseprovisions in the legislation of Ukraine are emphasized.It is relevant to take into account the Guidance of the Commission on Directive2004/48/EC, in particular, that the right holder could demand that the damages set asa lump sum are calculated not only because of the single amount of that hypotheticalroyalty/fee, but also based on other appropriate aspects. Regarding Commission evaluationof the Regulations (EC) No. 469/2009 and No. 1610/96 concerning the supplementaryprotection certificate for medicinal products and plant protection products, itis relevant to take into consideration in the legislation of Ukraine not only the provisionsof the specified regulations, but also the decisions of the ECJ on the interpretationof the specified acts. \\nRegarding geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products inthe EU-registration of GI for non-agricultural products is possible in Ukraine. However,the activities of the ministries need to be particularly strengthened, consideringthe experience of Poland, Moldova and other countries that envisage support fromgovernment authorities for the identification of promising geographical indications,assistance in creating associations of individuals to submit GI applications and in thepreparation of applications, as well as stimulating activities for the protection of GI.The relevance of the adoption in Ukraine of the Strategy for the Development ofthe Intellectual Property Sphere in Ukraine, which was developed in cooperation withWIPO back in 2019 and contains European oriented guidelines for the development ofthe sphere of intellectual property in Ukraine, is noted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33731/52022.270779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/52022.270779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键词:知识产权保护,欧盟,乌克兰与欧盟一体化,知识产权执法,版权保护研究2017-2022年欧盟知识产权法的现代发展。报告指出,欧盟委员会在分析欧盟法律的有效性和确定欧盟知识产权领域发展计划方面发挥了积极作用。请注意在乌克兰和欧盟关于知识产权一体化的框架内使用欧盟委员会文件的便利性(知识产权行动计划,COM/2020/760 final;知识产权执法制度,COM(2017) 707终稿;指令2004/48 /EC, COM(2017) 708 final,标准必要专利»,COM(2017) 712 final等指南;设计保护评估,2020;补充保护证书制度,2020年;强调了DSM指令(EU) 2019/790的重要性,该指令引入了可持续的支付制度,向作者和表演者提供公平报酬,以及在缺乏对该作品的利用的情况下有关许可或权利转让的撤销机制,以及在乌克兰立法中实施这些规定的相关性。考虑到欧盟委员会关于2004/48/EC指令的指导是相关的,特别是,权利人可以要求一次性支付的损害赔偿不仅是因为假设的特许权使用费/费用的单一金额,而且还基于其他适当的方面。关于委员会对关于药品和植物保护产品补充保护证书的法规(EC) No 469/2009和No 1610/96的评估,在乌克兰立法中不仅要考虑特定法规的规定,还要考虑欧洲法院关于特定行为解释的决定。关于欧盟工艺品和工业产品的地理标志保护,乌克兰可以注册非农业产品的地理标志。然而,考虑到波兰、摩尔多瓦和其他国家的经验,各部委的活动需要特别加强,这些国家设想政府当局支持有前途的地理标志的识别,协助建立个人协会提交地理标志申请和准备申请,以及促进保护地理标志的活动。委员会注意到乌克兰通过《乌克兰知识产权领域发展战略》的相关性,该战略是在2019年与wipo合作制定的,包含了乌克兰知识产权领域发展的面向欧洲的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern trends in the development of protection of intellectual property in the European Union in the context of the integration of Ukraine and the EU
Keywords: protection of intellectual property rights, European Union, integrationof Ukraine and the EU, enforcement of intellectual property, copyright protection The modern development of EU intellectual property law in2017-2022 is studied. The active role of the European Commission in analysing the effectivenessof EU acts and determining plans for the development of the sphere of intellectualproperty in the EU is noted. Attention is drawn to the expediency of usingEuropean Commission documents within the framework of the integration of Ukraineand the EU regarding IP (IP action plan, COM/2020/760 final; IP enforcement system,COM(2017) 707 final; guidance on Directive 2004/48 /EC, COM(2017) 708 final,standard essential patents», COM(2017) 712 final etc; evaluation of design designsprotection, 2020; system of supplementary protection certificate, 2020; geographicalindications protection, 2020 etc.The essential importance of the DSM Directive (EU) 2019/790 with introduction ofa sustainable system of payment the fair remuneration to authors and performers aswell revocation mechanism regarding licence or the transfer of rights where there is alack of exploitation of that work, and the relevance of the implementation of theseprovisions in the legislation of Ukraine are emphasized.It is relevant to take into account the Guidance of the Commission on Directive2004/48/EC, in particular, that the right holder could demand that the damages set asa lump sum are calculated not only because of the single amount of that hypotheticalroyalty/fee, but also based on other appropriate aspects. Regarding Commission evaluationof the Regulations (EC) No. 469/2009 and No. 1610/96 concerning the supplementaryprotection certificate for medicinal products and plant protection products, itis relevant to take into consideration in the legislation of Ukraine not only the provisionsof the specified regulations, but also the decisions of the ECJ on the interpretationof the specified acts. Regarding geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products inthe EU-registration of GI for non-agricultural products is possible in Ukraine. However,the activities of the ministries need to be particularly strengthened, consideringthe experience of Poland, Moldova and other countries that envisage support fromgovernment authorities for the identification of promising geographical indications,assistance in creating associations of individuals to submit GI applications and in thepreparation of applications, as well as stimulating activities for the protection of GI.The relevance of the adoption in Ukraine of the Strategy for the Development ofthe Intellectual Property Sphere in Ukraine, which was developed in cooperation withWIPO back in 2019 and contains European oriented guidelines for the development ofthe sphere of intellectual property in Ukraine, is noted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信