集体行动和脆弱性:埃塞俄比亚农村的丧葬协会

S. Dercon, J. Hoddinott, P. Krishnan, T. Woldehanna
{"title":"集体行动和脆弱性:埃塞俄比亚农村的丧葬协会","authors":"S. Dercon, J. Hoddinott, P. Krishnan, T. Woldehanna","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1260274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Collective action can help individuals, groups, and communities achieve common goals, thus contributing to poverty reduction. Drawing on longitudinal household and qualitative community data, the authors examine the impact of shocks on household living standards, study the correlates of participation in groups and formal and informal networks, and discuss the relationship of networks with access to other forms of capital. In this context, they assess how one form of collective action, iddir, or burial societies, help households attenuate the impact of illness. They find that iddir effectively deal with problems of asymmetric information by restricting membership geographically, imposing a membership fee, and conducting checks on how the funds were spent. The study also finds that while iddir help poor households cope with individual health shocks, but shows that the better-off households belong to more groups and have larger networks. In addition, where households have limited ability to develop spatial networks, collective action has limited ability to respond to covariate shocks. Therefore, realism is needed in terms of the ability of collective action to respond to shocks, and direct public action is more appropriate to deal with common shocks.\" authors' abstract","PeriodicalId":389672,"journal":{"name":"International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper Series","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Action and Vulnerability: Burial Societies in Rural Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"S. Dercon, J. Hoddinott, P. Krishnan, T. Woldehanna\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1260274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Collective action can help individuals, groups, and communities achieve common goals, thus contributing to poverty reduction. Drawing on longitudinal household and qualitative community data, the authors examine the impact of shocks on household living standards, study the correlates of participation in groups and formal and informal networks, and discuss the relationship of networks with access to other forms of capital. In this context, they assess how one form of collective action, iddir, or burial societies, help households attenuate the impact of illness. They find that iddir effectively deal with problems of asymmetric information by restricting membership geographically, imposing a membership fee, and conducting checks on how the funds were spent. The study also finds that while iddir help poor households cope with individual health shocks, but shows that the better-off households belong to more groups and have larger networks. In addition, where households have limited ability to develop spatial networks, collective action has limited ability to respond to covariate shocks. Therefore, realism is needed in terms of the ability of collective action to respond to shocks, and direct public action is more appropriate to deal with common shocks.\\\" authors' abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":389672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1260274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1260274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

“集体行动可以帮助个人、团体和社区实现共同目标,从而有助于减少贫困。利用纵向家庭和定性社区数据,作者考察了冲击对家庭生活水平的影响,研究了参与群体和正式和非正式网络的相关性,并讨论了网络与获得其他形式资本的关系。在此背景下,他们评估了一种集体行动形式,即iddir或埋葬协会如何帮助家庭减轻疾病的影响。他们发现iddir通过在地理上限制会员资格、征收会员费以及对资金使用情况进行检查,有效地解决了信息不对称问题。该研究还发现,虽然iddir帮助贫困家庭应对个人健康冲击,但富裕家庭属于更多的群体,拥有更大的网络。此外,在家庭发展空间网络的能力有限的地方,集体行动应对协变量冲击的能力有限。因此,就集体行动应对冲击的能力而言,需要现实主义,而直接的公共行动更适合于应对共同的冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective Action and Vulnerability: Burial Societies in Rural Ethiopia
"Collective action can help individuals, groups, and communities achieve common goals, thus contributing to poverty reduction. Drawing on longitudinal household and qualitative community data, the authors examine the impact of shocks on household living standards, study the correlates of participation in groups and formal and informal networks, and discuss the relationship of networks with access to other forms of capital. In this context, they assess how one form of collective action, iddir, or burial societies, help households attenuate the impact of illness. They find that iddir effectively deal with problems of asymmetric information by restricting membership geographically, imposing a membership fee, and conducting checks on how the funds were spent. The study also finds that while iddir help poor households cope with individual health shocks, but shows that the better-off households belong to more groups and have larger networks. In addition, where households have limited ability to develop spatial networks, collective action has limited ability to respond to covariate shocks. Therefore, realism is needed in terms of the ability of collective action to respond to shocks, and direct public action is more appropriate to deal with common shocks." authors' abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信