海运货物公约一致性考察:需要限制一致性的范围

L. Zhao
{"title":"海运货物公约一致性考察:需要限制一致性的范围","authors":"L. Zhao","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2601967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A survey targeting maritime professionals in China and Europe, particularly the United Kingdom, was conducted in order to evaluate their comprehension of the Rotterdam Rules. Despite the attempts of the United Nations to bring uniformity through the adoption and application of a revised and updated sea cargo convention, there is diversity in the understanding of key elements of the Rules, which jeopardizes widespread ratification. Research methods and design of the questionnaire are explained. Statistical evidence from the survey, which supplements and updates the 1995 World Trade Organization questionnaire, is presented. Finally, limitations of the survey and recommendations for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":104754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transportation law, logistics and policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey on the Uniformity of Seaborne Cargo Conventions: Need to Limit the Scope of Uniformity\",\"authors\":\"L. Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2601967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A survey targeting maritime professionals in China and Europe, particularly the United Kingdom, was conducted in order to evaluate their comprehension of the Rotterdam Rules. Despite the attempts of the United Nations to bring uniformity through the adoption and application of a revised and updated sea cargo convention, there is diversity in the understanding of key elements of the Rules, which jeopardizes widespread ratification. Research methods and design of the questionnaire are explained. Statistical evidence from the survey, which supplements and updates the 1995 World Trade Organization questionnaire, is presented. Finally, limitations of the survey and recommendations for future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of transportation law, logistics and policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of transportation law, logistics and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2601967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transportation law, logistics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2601967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对中国和欧洲,特别是英国的海事专业人员进行了一项调查,以评估他们对《鹿特丹规则》的理解程度。尽管联合国试图通过通过和适用一项经修订和增订的海上货物公约来实现统一,但对《规则》关键内容的理解却存在差异,这妨碍了公约的广泛批准。说明了调查问卷的研究方法和设计。该调查补充和增订了1995年世界贸易组织调查表,并提出了调查的统计证据。最后,讨论了本研究的局限性和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey on the Uniformity of Seaborne Cargo Conventions: Need to Limit the Scope of Uniformity
A survey targeting maritime professionals in China and Europe, particularly the United Kingdom, was conducted in order to evaluate their comprehension of the Rotterdam Rules. Despite the attempts of the United Nations to bring uniformity through the adoption and application of a revised and updated sea cargo convention, there is diversity in the understanding of key elements of the Rules, which jeopardizes widespread ratification. Research methods and design of the questionnaire are explained. Statistical evidence from the survey, which supplements and updates the 1995 World Trade Organization questionnaire, is presented. Finally, limitations of the survey and recommendations for future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信