通过总结结果知识中的最新信息加强自主学习

Shih-Wei Wu
{"title":"通过总结结果知识中的最新信息加强自主学习","authors":"Shih-Wei Wu","doi":"10.5297/ser.1801.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is necessary to clarify whether motor learners choose feedback information contents related to time course of motor memory after practicing in a series of movements through self-controlled learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of memory issues related to primacy and recency effects on motor performance and learning ability under the self-controlled learning. Sixty female adults served as participants, and were requested to practice a sequential timing task with three movement segments of "N" shape. All participants practiced 90 trials during the acquisition phase, and 24 hours delayed retention tests were administered. Participants were categorized into either more-recency SKR (summary knowledge of results) or more-primacy SKR groups, according to the selection of relatively high recency or primacy feedback trials after the acquisition phase. The results showed that more-recency SKR group had significantly higher accuracy than that of more-primacy SKR group in both acquisition phase and retention test. Furthermore, the change score was found no significant difference. Findings from this study suggest that choosing more recency information facilitated to enhance both motor performance and learning ability of movement accuracy through self-controlled learning.","PeriodicalId":338279,"journal":{"name":"Sports & Exercise Research","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Self-Controlled Learning through Recency Information in Summary Knowledge of Results\",\"authors\":\"Shih-Wei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.5297/ser.1801.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is necessary to clarify whether motor learners choose feedback information contents related to time course of motor memory after practicing in a series of movements through self-controlled learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of memory issues related to primacy and recency effects on motor performance and learning ability under the self-controlled learning. Sixty female adults served as participants, and were requested to practice a sequential timing task with three movement segments of "N" shape. All participants practiced 90 trials during the acquisition phase, and 24 hours delayed retention tests were administered. Participants were categorized into either more-recency SKR (summary knowledge of results) or more-primacy SKR groups, according to the selection of relatively high recency or primacy feedback trials after the acquisition phase. The results showed that more-recency SKR group had significantly higher accuracy than that of more-primacy SKR group in both acquisition phase and retention test. Furthermore, the change score was found no significant difference. Findings from this study suggest that choosing more recency information facilitated to enhance both motor performance and learning ability of movement accuracy through self-controlled learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports & Exercise Research\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports & Exercise Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1801.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports & Exercise Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1801.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有必要明确运动学习者在通过自我控制学习进行一系列动作练习后,是否选择了与运动记忆时间过程相关的反馈信息内容。摘要本研究旨在探讨在自我控制学习条件下,与首因效应和近因效应相关的记忆问题对运动表现和学习能力的影响。60名成年女性作为参与者,被要求练习一个有三个“N”形运动片段的连续计时任务。所有参与者在习得阶段进行了90次练习,并进行了24小时延迟记忆测试。根据获得阶段后相对较高的近因性或因因性反馈试验的选择,参与者被分为近因性SKR组(结果总结知识)组和因因性SKR组。结果表明,在习得阶段和记忆保留测试中,近代性记忆记忆组的准确率均显著高于近代性记忆记忆组。此外,变化得分没有发现显著差异。本研究结果表明,选择更多的近期信息有助于通过自我控制学习提高运动表现和运动准确性的学习能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Self-Controlled Learning through Recency Information in Summary Knowledge of Results
It is necessary to clarify whether motor learners choose feedback information contents related to time course of motor memory after practicing in a series of movements through self-controlled learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of memory issues related to primacy and recency effects on motor performance and learning ability under the self-controlled learning. Sixty female adults served as participants, and were requested to practice a sequential timing task with three movement segments of "N" shape. All participants practiced 90 trials during the acquisition phase, and 24 hours delayed retention tests were administered. Participants were categorized into either more-recency SKR (summary knowledge of results) or more-primacy SKR groups, according to the selection of relatively high recency or primacy feedback trials after the acquisition phase. The results showed that more-recency SKR group had significantly higher accuracy than that of more-primacy SKR group in both acquisition phase and retention test. Furthermore, the change score was found no significant difference. Findings from this study suggest that choosing more recency information facilitated to enhance both motor performance and learning ability of movement accuracy through self-controlled learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信