领域是否改变了个人对人类价值观的看法?电子健康应用终端用户的初步调查

Humphrey O. Obie, Mojtaba Shahin, John C. Grundy, Burak Turhan, Li Li, Waqar Hussain, J. Whittle
{"title":"领域是否改变了个人对人类价值观的看法?电子健康应用终端用户的初步调查","authors":"Humphrey O. Obie, Mojtaba Shahin, John C. Grundy, Burak Turhan, Li Li, Waqar Hussain, J. Whittle","doi":"10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The elicitation of end-users& human values - such as freedom, honesty, transparency, etc - is important in the development of software systems. We carried out two preliminary Q-studies to understand (a) the general human value opinion types of eHealth applications (apps) end-users (b) the eHealth domain human value opinion types of eHealth apps end-users (c) whether there are differences between the general and eHealth domain opinion types. Our early results show three value opinion types using generic value instruments: (1) fun-loving, success-driven and independent end-user, (2) security-conscious, socially-concerned, and success-driven end-user, and (3) benevolent, success-driven, and conformist end-user. Our results also show two value opinion types using domain-specific value instruments: (1) security-conscious, reputable, and honest end-user, and (2) success-driven, reputable and pain-avoiding end-user. Given these results, consideration should be given to domain context in the design and application of values elicitation instruments.","PeriodicalId":143800,"journal":{"name":"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Domain Change the Opinion of Individuals on Human Values? A Preliminary Investigation on eHealth Apps End-users\",\"authors\":\"Humphrey O. Obie, Mojtaba Shahin, John C. Grundy, Burak Turhan, Li Li, Waqar Hussain, J. Whittle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The elicitation of end-users& human values - such as freedom, honesty, transparency, etc - is important in the development of software systems. We carried out two preliminary Q-studies to understand (a) the general human value opinion types of eHealth applications (apps) end-users (b) the eHealth domain human value opinion types of eHealth apps end-users (c) whether there are differences between the general and eHealth domain opinion types. Our early results show three value opinion types using generic value instruments: (1) fun-loving, success-driven and independent end-user, (2) security-conscious, socially-concerned, and success-driven end-user, and (3) benevolent, success-driven, and conformist end-user. Our results also show two value opinion types using domain-specific value instruments: (1) security-conscious, reputable, and honest end-user, and (2) success-driven, reputable and pain-avoiding end-user. Given these results, consideration should be given to domain context in the design and application of values elicitation instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 28th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC53868.2021.00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

最终用户和人的价值——如自由、诚实、透明等——的启发在软件系统的开发中是重要的。我们进行了两项初步的q研究,以了解(a)电子健康应用程序(应用程序)最终用户的一般人类价值意见类型(b)电子健康应用程序最终用户的电子健康领域人类价值意见类型(c)一般和电子健康领域意见类型之间是否存在差异。我们的早期结果显示了使用通用价值工具的三种价值意见类型:(1)爱好乐趣、成功驱动和独立的最终用户;(2)安全意识、社会关注和成功驱动的最终用户;(3)仁慈、成功驱动和墨守成规的最终用户。我们的结果还显示了使用特定领域价值工具的两种价值意见类型:(1)安全意识强、信誉良好、诚实的最终用户,以及(2)成功驱动、信誉良好、避免痛苦的最终用户。鉴于这些结果,在设计和应用价值激发工具时应考虑领域背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Domain Change the Opinion of Individuals on Human Values? A Preliminary Investigation on eHealth Apps End-users
The elicitation of end-users& human values - such as freedom, honesty, transparency, etc - is important in the development of software systems. We carried out two preliminary Q-studies to understand (a) the general human value opinion types of eHealth applications (apps) end-users (b) the eHealth domain human value opinion types of eHealth apps end-users (c) whether there are differences between the general and eHealth domain opinion types. Our early results show three value opinion types using generic value instruments: (1) fun-loving, success-driven and independent end-user, (2) security-conscious, socially-concerned, and success-driven end-user, and (3) benevolent, success-driven, and conformist end-user. Our results also show two value opinion types using domain-specific value instruments: (1) security-conscious, reputable, and honest end-user, and (2) success-driven, reputable and pain-avoiding end-user. Given these results, consideration should be given to domain context in the design and application of values elicitation instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信