局部与联合环丙沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的疗效比较

Nasir Wakeel, Aasma Tariq, Iqra Gull, Hamna Hafeez
{"title":"局部与联合环丙沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的疗效比较","authors":"Nasir Wakeel, Aasma Tariq, Iqra Gull, Hamna Hafeez","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v14i3.697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Topical antibiotics are a popular choice for treating chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), but there is no consensus on their penetration ability in the middle ear, mastoid cavities, and effectiveness against the causative pathogens. Hence, the present study aimed to compare the efficacy of empirical treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) with topical ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with oral ciprofloxacin. \nMETHODOLOGY: In this prospective study, 98 consecutive patients presented with diagnosed CSOM of tubotympanic type were recruited from the ENT Department of Bahawal Victoria Hospital. The enrolled patients were randomly subjected to the treatment groups (49 in each group), i.e., topical ciprofloxacin drops alone or oral and topical ciprofloxacin in combination; the therapy continued for 1 week. After 7 days of treatment, patients were assessed to observe the resolution of discharge and adverse effects of the drugs. \nRESULTS: It was observed that 95.9% of the patients had complete resolution of discharge after 7 days of treatment; the outcomes were comparable in both treatment groups (p=1.00). There was no statistically significant difference between the patients of both treatment groups concerning gender, age, and discharge duration (p>0.05). There were minimal side effects but apparently, they were more frequent among group B patients than in group A. \nCONCLUSION: It is concluded from the study that topical ciprofloxacin alone is as efficacious as oral and topical combination therapy for the treatment of CSOM.","PeriodicalId":178216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of topical vs. combination ciprofloxacin for the treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media\",\"authors\":\"Nasir Wakeel, Aasma Tariq, Iqra Gull, Hamna Hafeez\",\"doi\":\"10.37723/jumdc.v14i3.697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Topical antibiotics are a popular choice for treating chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), but there is no consensus on their penetration ability in the middle ear, mastoid cavities, and effectiveness against the causative pathogens. Hence, the present study aimed to compare the efficacy of empirical treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) with topical ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with oral ciprofloxacin. \\nMETHODOLOGY: In this prospective study, 98 consecutive patients presented with diagnosed CSOM of tubotympanic type were recruited from the ENT Department of Bahawal Victoria Hospital. The enrolled patients were randomly subjected to the treatment groups (49 in each group), i.e., topical ciprofloxacin drops alone or oral and topical ciprofloxacin in combination; the therapy continued for 1 week. After 7 days of treatment, patients were assessed to observe the resolution of discharge and adverse effects of the drugs. \\nRESULTS: It was observed that 95.9% of the patients had complete resolution of discharge after 7 days of treatment; the outcomes were comparable in both treatment groups (p=1.00). There was no statistically significant difference between the patients of both treatment groups concerning gender, age, and discharge duration (p>0.05). There were minimal side effects but apparently, they were more frequent among group B patients than in group A. \\nCONCLUSION: It is concluded from the study that topical ciprofloxacin alone is as efficacious as oral and topical combination therapy for the treatment of CSOM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of University Medical & Dental College\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of University Medical & Dental College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v14i3.697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v14i3.697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:外用抗生素是治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)的常用选择,但其在中耳、乳突腔的渗透能力以及对致病菌的有效性尚无共识。因此,本研究旨在比较环丙沙星单独外用与联合口服环丙沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)的疗效。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,从Bahawal Victoria医院的耳鼻喉科招募了98名连续确诊为管鼓室型CSOM的患者。纳入的患者随机分为单独局部使用环丙沙星滴剂或口服与局部使用环丙沙星联合使用的治疗组(每组49人);治疗持续1周。治疗7 d后,对患者进行评估,观察出院情况及药物不良反应。结果:治疗7 d后,95.9%的患者完全出院;两组结果具有可比性(p=1.00)。两组患者性别、年龄、出院时间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。B组患者的不良反应虽小,但发生率明显高于a组。结论:本研究表明,单用环丙沙星治疗CSOM与口服、外用联合治疗效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of topical vs. combination ciprofloxacin for the treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Topical antibiotics are a popular choice for treating chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), but there is no consensus on their penetration ability in the middle ear, mastoid cavities, and effectiveness against the causative pathogens. Hence, the present study aimed to compare the efficacy of empirical treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) with topical ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with oral ciprofloxacin. METHODOLOGY: In this prospective study, 98 consecutive patients presented with diagnosed CSOM of tubotympanic type were recruited from the ENT Department of Bahawal Victoria Hospital. The enrolled patients were randomly subjected to the treatment groups (49 in each group), i.e., topical ciprofloxacin drops alone or oral and topical ciprofloxacin in combination; the therapy continued for 1 week. After 7 days of treatment, patients were assessed to observe the resolution of discharge and adverse effects of the drugs. RESULTS: It was observed that 95.9% of the patients had complete resolution of discharge after 7 days of treatment; the outcomes were comparable in both treatment groups (p=1.00). There was no statistically significant difference between the patients of both treatment groups concerning gender, age, and discharge duration (p>0.05). There were minimal side effects but apparently, they were more frequent among group B patients than in group A. CONCLUSION: It is concluded from the study that topical ciprofloxacin alone is as efficacious as oral and topical combination therapy for the treatment of CSOM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信