一种网络准入控制方法的性能评估框架

M. Menth, S. Kopf, J. Milbrandt
{"title":"一种网络准入控制方法的性能评估框架","authors":"M. Menth, S. Kopf, J. Milbrandt","doi":"10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce the notion of link and network admission control (LAC, NAC) and present three fundamentally different budget based NAC methods which categorize most of today's implemented NAC approaches. We propose a performance evaluation framework for their comparison. The required network capacity for each method is dimensioned for a certain flow blocking probability, and the average resource utilization is taken as performance measure. We point out several implementation options and investigate their impact. Based on numerical results, we give recommendations for preferred procedures. Finally, we compare different NAC methods under varying load conditions.","PeriodicalId":260367,"journal":{"name":"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)","volume":"33 Pt 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A performance evaluation framework for network admission control methods\",\"authors\":\"M. Menth, S. Kopf, J. Milbrandt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce the notion of link and network admission control (LAC, NAC) and present three fundamentally different budget based NAC methods which categorize most of today's implemented NAC approaches. We propose a performance evaluation framework for their comparison. The required network capacity for each method is dimensioned for a certain flow blocking probability, and the average resource utilization is taken as performance measure. We point out several implementation options and investigate their impact. Based on numerical results, we give recommendations for preferred procedures. Finally, we compare different NAC methods under varying load conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)\",\"volume\":\"33 Pt 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们介绍了链路和网络准入控制(LAC, NAC)的概念,并提出了三种根本不同的基于预算的NAC方法,这些方法对当今大多数实现的NAC方法进行了分类。我们提出了一个绩效评估框架进行比较。每种方法所需的网络容量以一定的流阻塞概率为尺度,并以平均资源利用率作为性能指标。我们指出了几种实施方案,并调查了它们的影响。基于数值结果,我们给出了优选程序的建议。最后,对不同载荷条件下的NAC方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A performance evaluation framework for network admission control methods
We introduce the notion of link and network admission control (LAC, NAC) and present three fundamentally different budget based NAC methods which categorize most of today's implemented NAC approaches. We propose a performance evaluation framework for their comparison. The required network capacity for each method is dimensioned for a certain flow blocking probability, and the average resource utilization is taken as performance measure. We point out several implementation options and investigate their impact. Based on numerical results, we give recommendations for preferred procedures. Finally, we compare different NAC methods under varying load conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信