社会工作与抵抗:联合研究的教训

P. Lyet
{"title":"社会工作与抵抗:联合研究的教训","authors":"P. Lyet","doi":"10.7202/1084637ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of the “resistance” of social actors to phenomena which do not suit them does not immediately lead to identifying the scientific world as an ally for these actors, as “classic” scientific productions appear to be difficult to mobilize by them, or even their own. propose, and sometimes impose on them, analysis logics which hardly correspond to their challenges. Other research dynamics that I will call joint research, which associate the actors / actresses concerned, can acculturate, on the one hand, them to the gaze constructed by scientific activity and, on the other hand, scientists to the understandings of actors / actresses. This process can allow the latter to have unprecedented intellectual tools in order to face their challenges in a new way. Such alliances, when they occur, restore individuals and groups as subjects and actors in their lives. Two examples of joint research illustrate this thesis. This article proposes to understand joint research as communicational dynamics. The co-investigating social actors participate in the construction of a common world where they learn from others as much as they learn from them and where their problem is recomposed. If there is resistance in joint research, it is resistance to the temptation of actors from all sides to sanctify certain understandings and therefore to impose them.","PeriodicalId":299687,"journal":{"name":"Reflets: Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Travail social et résistance : les leçons de recherches conjointes\",\"authors\":\"P. Lyet\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1084637ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of the “resistance” of social actors to phenomena which do not suit them does not immediately lead to identifying the scientific world as an ally for these actors, as “classic” scientific productions appear to be difficult to mobilize by them, or even their own. propose, and sometimes impose on them, analysis logics which hardly correspond to their challenges. Other research dynamics that I will call joint research, which associate the actors / actresses concerned, can acculturate, on the one hand, them to the gaze constructed by scientific activity and, on the other hand, scientists to the understandings of actors / actresses. This process can allow the latter to have unprecedented intellectual tools in order to face their challenges in a new way. Such alliances, when they occur, restore individuals and groups as subjects and actors in their lives. Two examples of joint research illustrate this thesis. This article proposes to understand joint research as communicational dynamics. The co-investigating social actors participate in the construction of a common world where they learn from others as much as they learn from them and where their problem is recomposed. If there is resistance in joint research, it is resistance to the temptation of actors from all sides to sanctify certain understandings and therefore to impose them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflets: Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflets: Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1084637ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflets: Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1084637ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Travail social et résistance : les leçons de recherches conjointes
The question of the “resistance” of social actors to phenomena which do not suit them does not immediately lead to identifying the scientific world as an ally for these actors, as “classic” scientific productions appear to be difficult to mobilize by them, or even their own. propose, and sometimes impose on them, analysis logics which hardly correspond to their challenges. Other research dynamics that I will call joint research, which associate the actors / actresses concerned, can acculturate, on the one hand, them to the gaze constructed by scientific activity and, on the other hand, scientists to the understandings of actors / actresses. This process can allow the latter to have unprecedented intellectual tools in order to face their challenges in a new way. Such alliances, when they occur, restore individuals and groups as subjects and actors in their lives. Two examples of joint research illustrate this thesis. This article proposes to understand joint research as communicational dynamics. The co-investigating social actors participate in the construction of a common world where they learn from others as much as they learn from them and where their problem is recomposed. If there is resistance in joint research, it is resistance to the temptation of actors from all sides to sanctify certain understandings and therefore to impose them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信