以福和哲三为代表的日本左派在马克思主义本土化中的失败与变革

Kenichiro Soyano
{"title":"以福和哲三为代表的日本左派在马克思主义本土化中的失败与变革","authors":"Kenichiro Soyano","doi":"10.59206/jops.v1i1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the similarities and differences between the Chinese rhetoric and the Japaneseization of Marxism. It does so in order to present the failure of socialist movements in Japan regardless of whether those movements opt for a revolutionary strategy or gain power through parliamentary democracy. As a result of the altered conditions, the Japanese Communist Party has enacted a variety of party policies, both internal and external, that take into account all local and worldwide problems, and has made more popular judgements.","PeriodicalId":234725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics and Strategy","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Failures and Changes of the Japanese Left, led by Tetsuzo Fuwa in the Localization of Marxism\",\"authors\":\"Kenichiro Soyano\",\"doi\":\"10.59206/jops.v1i1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research explores the similarities and differences between the Chinese rhetoric and the Japaneseization of Marxism. It does so in order to present the failure of socialist movements in Japan regardless of whether those movements opt for a revolutionary strategy or gain power through parliamentary democracy. As a result of the altered conditions, the Japanese Communist Party has enacted a variety of party policies, both internal and external, that take into account all local and worldwide problems, and has made more popular judgements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Politics and Strategy\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Politics and Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59206/jops.v1i1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics and Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59206/jops.v1i1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了马克思主义中国化修辞与日化修辞的异同。这是为了展示日本社会主义运动的失败,无论这些运动是选择革命战略还是通过议会民主主义获得权力。由于条件的改变,日本共产党制定了各种党内和外部政策,考虑到所有本地和全球问题,并做出了更受欢迎的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Failures and Changes of the Japanese Left, led by Tetsuzo Fuwa in the Localization of Marxism
This research explores the similarities and differences between the Chinese rhetoric and the Japaneseization of Marxism. It does so in order to present the failure of socialist movements in Japan regardless of whether those movements opt for a revolutionary strategy or gain power through parliamentary democracy. As a result of the altered conditions, the Japanese Communist Party has enacted a variety of party policies, both internal and external, that take into account all local and worldwide problems, and has made more popular judgements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信