{"title":"内部监管解释:一份研究报告","authors":"Christopher J. Walker","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2660135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to Kevin M. Stack, Interpreting Regulations, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 355 (2012). In Interpreting Regulations, Professor Stack provides the first comprehensive approach to regulatory interpretation and situates this approach within the larger literature on legal interpretation. His theory of regulatory interpretation is simple yet pioneering: “a regulation should be read in light of its purposes, with the regulation’s text and the statement of basis and purpose constituting the privileged interpretive sources.” This Research Note takes a look inside regulatory interpretation to explore the empirical foundation for Professor Stack’s novel approach to regulatory interpretation. In 2013, the author conducted a 195-question survey of 128 federal agency rule drafters at seven executive departments (Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and Transportation) and two independent agencies (the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Reserve). Part I of this Research Note presents the findings from this study for the questions that were designed to assess Professor Stack’s theory of regulatory interpretation from the perspective of the agency officials who draft these statements of basis and purpose. These findings largely support his theory. Part II then takes a step back to explain how the other findings from the study bear on regulatory interpretation.","PeriodicalId":362456,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Law Review, First Impressions","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inside Regulatory Interpretation: A Research Note\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2660135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In response to Kevin M. Stack, Interpreting Regulations, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 355 (2012). In Interpreting Regulations, Professor Stack provides the first comprehensive approach to regulatory interpretation and situates this approach within the larger literature on legal interpretation. His theory of regulatory interpretation is simple yet pioneering: “a regulation should be read in light of its purposes, with the regulation’s text and the statement of basis and purpose constituting the privileged interpretive sources.” This Research Note takes a look inside regulatory interpretation to explore the empirical foundation for Professor Stack’s novel approach to regulatory interpretation. In 2013, the author conducted a 195-question survey of 128 federal agency rule drafters at seven executive departments (Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and Transportation) and two independent agencies (the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Reserve). Part I of this Research Note presents the findings from this study for the questions that were designed to assess Professor Stack’s theory of regulatory interpretation from the perspective of the agency officials who draft these statements of basis and purpose. These findings largely support his theory. Part II then takes a step back to explain how the other findings from the study bear on regulatory interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":362456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan Law Review, First Impressions\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan Law Review, First Impressions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2660135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Law Review, First Impressions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2660135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
对Kevin M. Stack的《解释法规》(interpretation Regulations)的回应。L. Rev. 355(2012)。在《解释法规》一书中,斯塔克教授提供了第一个全面的法规解释方法,并将这种方法置于法律解释的更大文献中。他的法规解释理论简单但具有开创性:“应该根据其目的来解读法规,法规的文本以及对基础和目的的陈述构成了特权的解释来源。”本研究报告从监管解释的内部入手,探讨斯塔克教授监管解释新方法的实证基础。2013年,作者对七个行政部门(农业部、商务部、能源部、国土安全部、卫生与公共服务部、住房与城市发展部、交通部)和两个独立机构(联邦通信委员会和美联储)的128名联邦机构规则起草者进行了195个问题的调查。本研究报告的第一部分介绍了本研究的结果,这些问题旨在从起草这些基础和目的声明的机构官员的角度评估斯塔克教授的监管解释理论。这些发现在很大程度上支持了他的理论。然后,第二部分退一步解释了该研究的其他发现如何影响监管解释。
In response to Kevin M. Stack, Interpreting Regulations, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 355 (2012). In Interpreting Regulations, Professor Stack provides the first comprehensive approach to regulatory interpretation and situates this approach within the larger literature on legal interpretation. His theory of regulatory interpretation is simple yet pioneering: “a regulation should be read in light of its purposes, with the regulation’s text and the statement of basis and purpose constituting the privileged interpretive sources.” This Research Note takes a look inside regulatory interpretation to explore the empirical foundation for Professor Stack’s novel approach to regulatory interpretation. In 2013, the author conducted a 195-question survey of 128 federal agency rule drafters at seven executive departments (Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and Transportation) and two independent agencies (the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Reserve). Part I of this Research Note presents the findings from this study for the questions that were designed to assess Professor Stack’s theory of regulatory interpretation from the perspective of the agency officials who draft these statements of basis and purpose. These findings largely support his theory. Part II then takes a step back to explain how the other findings from the study bear on regulatory interpretation.