{"title":"静态分析工具的定量评价","authors":"Shin'ichi Shiraishi, Veena Mohan, Hemalatha Marimuthu","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2014.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a quantitative comparison of static analysis tools. First, we conduct a wide-ranging survey of static analysis tools and select several promising tools qualitatively. Second, we build test suites that contain a large variety of defects and evaluate the selected tools with them. Third, we derive several metrics for measuring tool performance and subsequently clarify the characteristics of the said tools by using them. Finally, we quantitatively identify the best tools from several different viewpoints.","PeriodicalId":220698,"journal":{"name":"ISSRE Workshops","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Evaluation of Static Analysis Tools\",\"authors\":\"Shin'ichi Shiraishi, Veena Mohan, Hemalatha Marimuthu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2014.62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a quantitative comparison of static analysis tools. First, we conduct a wide-ranging survey of static analysis tools and select several promising tools qualitatively. Second, we build test suites that contain a large variety of defects and evaluate the selected tools with them. Third, we derive several metrics for measuring tool performance and subsequently clarify the characteristics of the said tools by using them. Finally, we quantitatively identify the best tools from several different viewpoints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISSRE Workshops\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISSRE Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2014.62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISSRE Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2014.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents a quantitative comparison of static analysis tools. First, we conduct a wide-ranging survey of static analysis tools and select several promising tools qualitatively. Second, we build test suites that contain a large variety of defects and evaluate the selected tools with them. Third, we derive several metrics for measuring tool performance and subsequently clarify the characteristics of the said tools by using them. Finally, we quantitatively identify the best tools from several different viewpoints.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
