谁控制什么?

L. Pereira, António Barata Lopes
{"title":"谁控制什么?","authors":"L. Pereira, António Barata Lopes","doi":"10.14361/9783839449462-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between AI and power is a robust case of the general relationship between knowledge and domination. At present, countries and corporations are competing for the best solutions, and the weight of business—in an increasingly less regulated world—is progressively greater. Under the guise that the private do better and cheaper than the State, the business logic of profit invades critical areas such as Defence, Health, Justice, Education and Social Security. The transformation of each citizen into a user or customer with a defined potential is advancing rapidly. In this circumstance, it is urgent to regulate. While it is true that a certain level of competitiveness is healthy and beneficial for all, it is also clear that pure competitiveness leads to knowledge protection logics and to the introduction of solutions in the market without proper safety testing. In short, a general attitude of not caring about the means that serve the ends prevails. Here we argue that there should be regulatory institutions and control processes aiming at developing a benevolent AI, one at the service of society and of knowledge, which is fair for all.","PeriodicalId":219119,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Controls What?\",\"authors\":\"L. Pereira, António Barata Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.14361/9783839449462-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between AI and power is a robust case of the general relationship between knowledge and domination. At present, countries and corporations are competing for the best solutions, and the weight of business—in an increasingly less regulated world—is progressively greater. Under the guise that the private do better and cheaper than the State, the business logic of profit invades critical areas such as Defence, Health, Justice, Education and Social Security. The transformation of each citizen into a user or customer with a defined potential is advancing rapidly. In this circumstance, it is urgent to regulate. While it is true that a certain level of competitiveness is healthy and beneficial for all, it is also clear that pure competitiveness leads to knowledge protection logics and to the introduction of solutions in the market without proper safety testing. In short, a general attitude of not caring about the means that serve the ends prevails. Here we argue that there should be regulatory institutions and control processes aiming at developing a benevolent AI, one at the service of society and of knowledge, which is fair for all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839449462-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839449462-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能和权力之间的关系是知识和统治之间一般关系的一个强有力的例子。目前,各国和各公司都在为最佳解决方案而竞争,而在一个监管越来越少的世界里,商业的重要性也在逐渐增加。在私营企业比国有企业做得更好、成本更低的幌子下,利润的商业逻辑侵入了国防、卫生、司法、教育和社会保障等关键领域。将每个公民转变为具有明确潜力的用户或客户的过程正在迅速推进。在这种情况下,监管刻不容缓。诚然,一定程度的竞争对所有人都是健康和有益的,但同样明显的是,纯粹的竞争会导致知识保护逻辑和在没有适当安全测试的情况下向市场推出解决方案。简而言之,一种不关心服务于目的的手段的普遍态度盛行。在这里,我们认为应该有监管机构和控制程序,旨在开发一个仁慈的人工智能,为社会和知识服务,这对所有人都是公平的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Controls What?
The relationship between AI and power is a robust case of the general relationship between knowledge and domination. At present, countries and corporations are competing for the best solutions, and the weight of business—in an increasingly less regulated world—is progressively greater. Under the guise that the private do better and cheaper than the State, the business logic of profit invades critical areas such as Defence, Health, Justice, Education and Social Security. The transformation of each citizen into a user or customer with a defined potential is advancing rapidly. In this circumstance, it is urgent to regulate. While it is true that a certain level of competitiveness is healthy and beneficial for all, it is also clear that pure competitiveness leads to knowledge protection logics and to the introduction of solutions in the market without proper safety testing. In short, a general attitude of not caring about the means that serve the ends prevails. Here we argue that there should be regulatory institutions and control processes aiming at developing a benevolent AI, one at the service of society and of knowledge, which is fair for all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信