{"title":"对性别差距征税:意大利女性工资税削减对劳动力市场的影响","authors":"Enrico Rubolino","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3888305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the role of government policies to stimulate female labor demand in gender imbalanced labor markets. I focus on a large employer-borne payroll tax cut for new female hires implemented in Italy since 2013. The preferential tax scheme provides more favorable eligibility criteria in contexts with low female participation rates. I combine social security data with several empirical approaches, leveraging the time-limited application of the tax scheme and discontinuities in eligibility criteria across municipalities, cohorts and occupations. I present four key results. First, employers pocket the tax cut: I find no effect on net- of-tax wages of directly treated workers, suggesting that tax incidence is mostly on firms. Second, I provide compelling evidence of long-lasting growth in female employment and a drop in the average non-employment duration of women entering unemployment insurance after the reform. Third, despite the time-limited nature of the preferential tax scheme creates a substantial notch in the budget constraint of employers, I find small, although statistically significant, bunching in job duration. Fourth, firms hiring many female workers experience significant growth in sales, profits, value added and capital per-worker, without raising male employees’ layoffs. Effects are mostly concentrated among firms operating in industries where a large portion of the workforce has conservative gender beliefs. These findings suggest that employer-borne payroll tax cuts are a successful strategy to promote female employment and business growth in contexts where gender attitudes are still traditional, but they are not sufficient for closing the gender pay gap.","PeriodicalId":340221,"journal":{"name":"WGSRN: Gender Gaps in Employment & Income (Sub-Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxing the Gender Gap: Labor Market Effects of a Payroll Tax Cut for Women in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Rubolino\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3888305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the role of government policies to stimulate female labor demand in gender imbalanced labor markets. I focus on a large employer-borne payroll tax cut for new female hires implemented in Italy since 2013. The preferential tax scheme provides more favorable eligibility criteria in contexts with low female participation rates. I combine social security data with several empirical approaches, leveraging the time-limited application of the tax scheme and discontinuities in eligibility criteria across municipalities, cohorts and occupations. I present four key results. First, employers pocket the tax cut: I find no effect on net- of-tax wages of directly treated workers, suggesting that tax incidence is mostly on firms. Second, I provide compelling evidence of long-lasting growth in female employment and a drop in the average non-employment duration of women entering unemployment insurance after the reform. Third, despite the time-limited nature of the preferential tax scheme creates a substantial notch in the budget constraint of employers, I find small, although statistically significant, bunching in job duration. Fourth, firms hiring many female workers experience significant growth in sales, profits, value added and capital per-worker, without raising male employees’ layoffs. Effects are mostly concentrated among firms operating in industries where a large portion of the workforce has conservative gender beliefs. These findings suggest that employer-borne payroll tax cuts are a successful strategy to promote female employment and business growth in contexts where gender attitudes are still traditional, but they are not sufficient for closing the gender pay gap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WGSRN: Gender Gaps in Employment & Income (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WGSRN: Gender Gaps in Employment & Income (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WGSRN: Gender Gaps in Employment & Income (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Taxing the Gender Gap: Labor Market Effects of a Payroll Tax Cut for Women in Italy
This paper studies the role of government policies to stimulate female labor demand in gender imbalanced labor markets. I focus on a large employer-borne payroll tax cut for new female hires implemented in Italy since 2013. The preferential tax scheme provides more favorable eligibility criteria in contexts with low female participation rates. I combine social security data with several empirical approaches, leveraging the time-limited application of the tax scheme and discontinuities in eligibility criteria across municipalities, cohorts and occupations. I present four key results. First, employers pocket the tax cut: I find no effect on net- of-tax wages of directly treated workers, suggesting that tax incidence is mostly on firms. Second, I provide compelling evidence of long-lasting growth in female employment and a drop in the average non-employment duration of women entering unemployment insurance after the reform. Third, despite the time-limited nature of the preferential tax scheme creates a substantial notch in the budget constraint of employers, I find small, although statistically significant, bunching in job duration. Fourth, firms hiring many female workers experience significant growth in sales, profits, value added and capital per-worker, without raising male employees’ layoffs. Effects are mostly concentrated among firms operating in industries where a large portion of the workforce has conservative gender beliefs. These findings suggest that employer-borne payroll tax cuts are a successful strategy to promote female employment and business growth in contexts where gender attitudes are still traditional, but they are not sufficient for closing the gender pay gap.