利用独立t检验比较高中学生线上与线下数学学习成果

Dame Meldaria Sipahutar
{"title":"利用独立t检验比较高中学生线上与线下数学学习成果","authors":"Dame Meldaria Sipahutar","doi":"10.51276/edu.v4i2.413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematics is one of the compulsory subjects in formal education and has an essential role in the world of education. This research was conducted to determine the results of learning mathematics in students at STIKes Senior Medan online and offline. This study used a quasi-experiment using the comparative method. The number of samples used was from two classes and given two other learning treatments, namely online and offline. The samples used were 34 students for the odd school year 2020/2021 (online) and 39 for the bizarre school year 2021/2022 (offline). Then a normality and homogeneity test was carried out using the Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) application program to determine whether the data were normally distributed and had the same variance. The results of testing the hypothesis using the independent t-test sig (2-tailed) 0.048 <0.05, so that as a basis for decision making in the independent sample t-test, it can be concluded that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, with a 95% confidence level, there is a significant (significant) difference between online learning UAS mathematics learning outcomes and offline learning UAS mathematics learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":326722,"journal":{"name":"Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Mathematics Learning Outcomes Online and Offline Students at Senior STIKES Medan Using Independent T-Test\",\"authors\":\"Dame Meldaria Sipahutar\",\"doi\":\"10.51276/edu.v4i2.413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mathematics is one of the compulsory subjects in formal education and has an essential role in the world of education. This research was conducted to determine the results of learning mathematics in students at STIKes Senior Medan online and offline. This study used a quasi-experiment using the comparative method. The number of samples used was from two classes and given two other learning treatments, namely online and offline. The samples used were 34 students for the odd school year 2020/2021 (online) and 39 for the bizarre school year 2021/2022 (offline). Then a normality and homogeneity test was carried out using the Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) application program to determine whether the data were normally distributed and had the same variance. The results of testing the hypothesis using the independent t-test sig (2-tailed) 0.048 <0.05, so that as a basis for decision making in the independent sample t-test, it can be concluded that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, with a 95% confidence level, there is a significant (significant) difference between online learning UAS mathematics learning outcomes and offline learning UAS mathematics learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i2.413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i2.413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学是正规教育的必修科目之一,在教育领域具有重要作用。本研究是为了确定学生在史迪克高级棉兰在线和离线学习数学的结果。本研究采用比较法进行准实验。使用的样本数量来自两个班级,并给予另外两种学习处理,即在线和离线。使用的样本是34名来自2020/2021学年(在线)的奇怪学生和39名来自2021/2022学年(离线)的奇怪学生。然后使用统计产品与服务解决方案(SPSS)应用程序进行正态性和齐性检验,以确定数据是否呈正态分布,是否具有相同的方差。使用独立t检验sig(双尾)0.048 <0.05检验假设的结果,因此作为决策依据的独立样本t检验中,可以得出Ho被拒绝,Ha被接受的结论。因此,在95%的置信水平上,在线学习UAS数学学习成果与离线学习UAS数学学习成果之间存在显著(significant)差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Mathematics Learning Outcomes Online and Offline Students at Senior STIKES Medan Using Independent T-Test
Mathematics is one of the compulsory subjects in formal education and has an essential role in the world of education. This research was conducted to determine the results of learning mathematics in students at STIKes Senior Medan online and offline. This study used a quasi-experiment using the comparative method. The number of samples used was from two classes and given two other learning treatments, namely online and offline. The samples used were 34 students for the odd school year 2020/2021 (online) and 39 for the bizarre school year 2021/2022 (offline). Then a normality and homogeneity test was carried out using the Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) application program to determine whether the data were normally distributed and had the same variance. The results of testing the hypothesis using the independent t-test sig (2-tailed) 0.048 <0.05, so that as a basis for decision making in the independent sample t-test, it can be concluded that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, with a 95% confidence level, there is a significant (significant) difference between online learning UAS mathematics learning outcomes and offline learning UAS mathematics learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信