数字劳动文献中的“范式冲突”:在实证研究中调和批判理论和解释方法

O. Rodak, Karolina Mikołajewska-Zając
{"title":"数字劳动文献中的“范式冲突”:在实证研究中调和批判理论和解释方法","authors":"O. Rodak, Karolina Mikołajewska-Zając","doi":"10.1145/3097286.3097341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"'Digital labour' has become an umbrella term for the stream of research dealing with web users' participation in digital culture. It critically frames social media participation within a wider political economy of the Internet where it is captured and translated into exchange value for platform providers and powerful organizations. Though it adds a much-needed critical perspective to the discussion on this phenomenon, digital labour theory does not provide sufficient methodological guidelines for social research. This remark applies especially to the problem of including a \"micro-perspective\" in theory-development, that is, social actors' experiences and perceptions. After performing the pilot literature study, we found that this challenge is recognized by most scholars conducting empirical research referring to digital labour, however, there is little consent of how it could be solved. We argue that this problem may be reframed as an intra-disciplinary \"paradigm clash\" -- the incommensurability of the critical and the interpretive tradition in social science. We collect preliminary insights from research papers and call for conceptualizations that will inform empirical researchers of how to involve a micro-perspective while building the digital labour theory.","PeriodicalId":130378,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Paradigm Clash' in the Digital Labor Literature: Reconciling Critical Theory and Interpretive Approach in Empirical Research\",\"authors\":\"O. Rodak, Karolina Mikołajewska-Zając\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3097286.3097341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"'Digital labour' has become an umbrella term for the stream of research dealing with web users' participation in digital culture. It critically frames social media participation within a wider political economy of the Internet where it is captured and translated into exchange value for platform providers and powerful organizations. Though it adds a much-needed critical perspective to the discussion on this phenomenon, digital labour theory does not provide sufficient methodological guidelines for social research. This remark applies especially to the problem of including a \\\"micro-perspective\\\" in theory-development, that is, social actors' experiences and perceptions. After performing the pilot literature study, we found that this challenge is recognized by most scholars conducting empirical research referring to digital labour, however, there is little consent of how it could be solved. We argue that this problem may be reframed as an intra-disciplinary \\\"paradigm clash\\\" -- the incommensurability of the critical and the interpretive tradition in social science. We collect preliminary insights from research papers and call for conceptualizations that will inform empirical researchers of how to involve a micro-perspective while building the digital labour theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“数字劳动”已经成为研究网络用户参与数字文化的一系列研究的总称。它批判性地将社交媒体参与框架在更广泛的互联网政治经济中,在那里它被捕获并转化为平台提供商和强大组织的交换价值。虽然它为这一现象的讨论增加了一个急需的批判性视角,但数字劳动理论并没有为社会研究提供足够的方法论指导。这句话特别适用于在理论发展中纳入“微观视角”的问题,即社会行动者的经验和看法。在进行试点文献研究后,我们发现这一挑战得到了大多数进行数字劳动力实证研究的学者的认可,然而,对于如何解决这一挑战却几乎没有共识。我们认为,这个问题可能被重新定义为学科内部的“范式冲突”——社会科学中批判和解释传统的不可通约性。我们从研究论文中收集了初步的见解,并呼吁概念化,这将告知实证研究人员如何在构建数字劳动理论时涉及微观视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Paradigm Clash' in the Digital Labor Literature: Reconciling Critical Theory and Interpretive Approach in Empirical Research
'Digital labour' has become an umbrella term for the stream of research dealing with web users' participation in digital culture. It critically frames social media participation within a wider political economy of the Internet where it is captured and translated into exchange value for platform providers and powerful organizations. Though it adds a much-needed critical perspective to the discussion on this phenomenon, digital labour theory does not provide sufficient methodological guidelines for social research. This remark applies especially to the problem of including a "micro-perspective" in theory-development, that is, social actors' experiences and perceptions. After performing the pilot literature study, we found that this challenge is recognized by most scholars conducting empirical research referring to digital labour, however, there is little consent of how it could be solved. We argue that this problem may be reframed as an intra-disciplinary "paradigm clash" -- the incommensurability of the critical and the interpretive tradition in social science. We collect preliminary insights from research papers and call for conceptualizations that will inform empirical researchers of how to involve a micro-perspective while building the digital labour theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信