在服务前谈判中应用间隔技术的优势和排名问题

P. Tsvetinov, A. Underwood, Taizan Chan
{"title":"在服务前谈判中应用间隔技术的优势和排名问题","authors":"P. Tsvetinov, A. Underwood, Taizan Chan","doi":"10.1145/1141277.1141482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study looks at the application of preference programming approaches and techniques for decision support during prenegotiations over services. In hierarchical decision analysis models the need for multi-attribute evaluation techniques that may incorporate uncertainties directly in the modeling phase has resulted in the use of the 'interval' approach. With such an approach, preference judgments are presented as ranges including all possible value estimates. This paper reports the results of applying an interval preference programming approach and technique in decision support scenarios for reasoning during pre-negotiations over services. The aim has been to critically evaluate the approach and establish its applicability for ranking multi-dimensional service offers. Our experimental results using interval SMART, in pre-negotiation decision making scenarios, showed that while the dominance relations among alternatives remained unchanged following the introduction of uncertainty intervals, the rank order and dominance relations of the alternatives may vary as a result of the addition or dropping of new alternatives with inferior values.","PeriodicalId":269830,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dominance and ranking issues applying interval techniques in pre-negotiations for services\",\"authors\":\"P. Tsvetinov, A. Underwood, Taizan Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1141277.1141482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study looks at the application of preference programming approaches and techniques for decision support during prenegotiations over services. In hierarchical decision analysis models the need for multi-attribute evaluation techniques that may incorporate uncertainties directly in the modeling phase has resulted in the use of the 'interval' approach. With such an approach, preference judgments are presented as ranges including all possible value estimates. This paper reports the results of applying an interval preference programming approach and technique in decision support scenarios for reasoning during pre-negotiations over services. The aim has been to critically evaluate the approach and establish its applicability for ranking multi-dimensional service offers. Our experimental results using interval SMART, in pre-negotiation decision making scenarios, showed that while the dominance relations among alternatives remained unchanged following the introduction of uncertainty intervals, the rank order and dominance relations of the alternatives may vary as a result of the addition or dropping of new alternatives with inferior values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究着眼于在服务谈判前的决策支持中应用偏好规划方法和技术。在分层决策分析模型中,由于需要在建模阶段直接包含不确定性的多属性评估技术,因此使用了“区间”方法。使用这种方法,偏好判断呈现为包括所有可能的价值估计的范围。本文报告了将区间偏好规划方法和技术应用于服务预协商过程中推理的决策支持场景的结果。目的是批判性地评估该方法,并确定其对多维服务提供排序的适用性。在预协商决策场景下,我们使用区间SMART的实验结果表明,在引入不确定性区间后,方案之间的优势关系保持不变,但由于新方案的增加或减少,具有劣值的方案的秩序和优势关系可能会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dominance and ranking issues applying interval techniques in pre-negotiations for services
The study looks at the application of preference programming approaches and techniques for decision support during prenegotiations over services. In hierarchical decision analysis models the need for multi-attribute evaluation techniques that may incorporate uncertainties directly in the modeling phase has resulted in the use of the 'interval' approach. With such an approach, preference judgments are presented as ranges including all possible value estimates. This paper reports the results of applying an interval preference programming approach and technique in decision support scenarios for reasoning during pre-negotiations over services. The aim has been to critically evaluate the approach and establish its applicability for ranking multi-dimensional service offers. Our experimental results using interval SMART, in pre-negotiation decision making scenarios, showed that while the dominance relations among alternatives remained unchanged following the introduction of uncertainty intervals, the rank order and dominance relations of the alternatives may vary as a result of the addition or dropping of new alternatives with inferior values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信