{"title":"区块链治理中去中心化的多维概念化:评论“同一枚硬币的两面?”去中心化的区块链与专有的区块链以及数字货币的表现,作者:Cennamo, Marchesi和Meyer","authors":"Hanna Halaburda, Christoph Mueller-Bloch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3746182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary, we argue that studies similar to Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer (2020) should distinguish four dimensions of control in blockchain governance, all of which could be more or less decentralized. For some of these dimensions, decentralization is likely beneficial, while for others centralization may be preferable. Cennamo et al. (2020) provide evidence that the initial design stages of blockchain systems benefit from centralization. Future research is needed to provide empirical insights for other dimensions of control in blockchain governance.","PeriodicalId":105736,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","volume":"36 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Decentralization in Blockchain Governance: Commentary on ‘Two Sides of the Same Coin? Decentralized Versus Proprietary Blockchains and the Performance of Digital Currencies’ by Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Halaburda, Christoph Mueller-Bloch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3746182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this commentary, we argue that studies similar to Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer (2020) should distinguish four dimensions of control in blockchain governance, all of which could be more or less decentralized. For some of these dimensions, decentralization is likely beneficial, while for others centralization may be preferable. Cennamo et al. (2020) provide evidence that the initial design stages of blockchain systems benefit from centralization. Future research is needed to provide empirical insights for other dimensions of control in blockchain governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal\",\"volume\":\"36 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Decentralization in Blockchain Governance: Commentary on ‘Two Sides of the Same Coin? Decentralized Versus Proprietary Blockchains and the Performance of Digital Currencies’ by Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer
In this commentary, we argue that studies similar to Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer (2020) should distinguish four dimensions of control in blockchain governance, all of which could be more or less decentralized. For some of these dimensions, decentralization is likely beneficial, while for others centralization may be preferable. Cennamo et al. (2020) provide evidence that the initial design stages of blockchain systems benefit from centralization. Future research is needed to provide empirical insights for other dimensions of control in blockchain governance.