乌克兰顶级博客所产生的媒体叙事的独特性

Artem Zakharchenko, Yuliia Sysoieva, Hanna Komnatska
{"title":"乌克兰顶级博客所产生的媒体叙事的独特性","authors":"Artem Zakharchenko, Yuliia Sysoieva, Hanna Komnatska","doi":"10.17721/2522-1272.2022.80.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows the differences between reception of a media narrative, i.e. a narrative about the current events generated by Ukrainian top bloggers, and a narrative generated by traditional media. The objective of the study is to reveal the structure of media narrative‟s segment formed by top bloggers in the key social media platforms and to identify the differences with similar structures in the traditional media. The automatic content analysis was used to gather the data about coverage of topics in different communicative spaces; the correlation analysis was used to identify correlations between top bloggers‟ focus on the topic and readers‟ responses on their posts, as well as attention of traditional media and attention of wider social media users to similar topics; the comparison method was used to detect differences between the fixed patterns from the same patterns in traditional media. The study shows that the audience‟s attention of top bloggers is formed by the principles that are entirely different from those in traditional media. While in both communicative spaces the readers‟ attention is defined by serial-structured media narrative, in the case of traditional media it is “serials” in fact: the reader first of all tracks “long” plotlines that are lasted for months and longer. In contrast of blog space, a reader tracks a media narrative in the format of “series”, focusing mainly on the short, event-based topics. This finding is important because this may indicate the specificity of media consumption of those part of audience that obtains the news just from social media. They more often consume information in fragments, focusing on debates related to the current topics without awareness of duration of political and economic processes, therefore it is easier to manipulate such an audience.","PeriodicalId":328436,"journal":{"name":"Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism","volume":"424 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Peculiarities of a Media Narrative Generated by Ukrainian Top Bloggers\",\"authors\":\"Artem Zakharchenko, Yuliia Sysoieva, Hanna Komnatska\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/2522-1272.2022.80.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper shows the differences between reception of a media narrative, i.e. a narrative about the current events generated by Ukrainian top bloggers, and a narrative generated by traditional media. The objective of the study is to reveal the structure of media narrative‟s segment formed by top bloggers in the key social media platforms and to identify the differences with similar structures in the traditional media. The automatic content analysis was used to gather the data about coverage of topics in different communicative spaces; the correlation analysis was used to identify correlations between top bloggers‟ focus on the topic and readers‟ responses on their posts, as well as attention of traditional media and attention of wider social media users to similar topics; the comparison method was used to detect differences between the fixed patterns from the same patterns in traditional media. The study shows that the audience‟s attention of top bloggers is formed by the principles that are entirely different from those in traditional media. While in both communicative spaces the readers‟ attention is defined by serial-structured media narrative, in the case of traditional media it is “serials” in fact: the reader first of all tracks “long” plotlines that are lasted for months and longer. In contrast of blog space, a reader tracks a media narrative in the format of “series”, focusing mainly on the short, event-based topics. This finding is important because this may indicate the specificity of media consumption of those part of audience that obtains the news just from social media. They more often consume information in fragments, focusing on debates related to the current topics without awareness of duration of political and economic processes, therefore it is easier to manipulate such an audience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism\",\"volume\":\"424 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/2522-1272.2022.80.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2522-1272.2022.80.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文显示媒体叙事,即由乌克兰顶尖博客撰写的时事叙事,与传统媒体撰写的叙事,在接受度上的差异。本研究的目的是揭示主要社交媒体平台上的顶级博主所形成的媒体叙事片段的结构,并找出其与传统媒体中类似结构的差异。采用内容自动分析的方法,收集话题在不同交际空间的覆盖数据;通过相关分析,确定顶级博主“关注话题”与读者对其帖子的回应,以及传统媒体对类似话题的关注和更广泛的社交媒体用户对类似话题的关注之间的相关性;采用比较方法检测固定图案与传统媒体中相同图案之间的差异。研究表明,顶级博主受众注意力的形成原则与传统媒体完全不同。在这两种交流空间中,读者的注意力都是由连续结构的媒体叙事来定义的,而在传统媒体中,它实际上是“连续的”:读者首先追踪持续数月甚至更长时间的“长”情节。与博客空间不同,读者会以“系列”的形式追踪媒体叙事,主要关注简短、以事件为基础的话题。这一发现很重要,因为这可能表明那些只从社交媒体上获取新闻的观众的媒体消费的特殊性。他们更多地是片断地消费信息,关注与当前主题有关的辩论,而不了解政治和经济进程的持续时间,因此更容易操纵这样的受众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Peculiarities of a Media Narrative Generated by Ukrainian Top Bloggers
This paper shows the differences between reception of a media narrative, i.e. a narrative about the current events generated by Ukrainian top bloggers, and a narrative generated by traditional media. The objective of the study is to reveal the structure of media narrative‟s segment formed by top bloggers in the key social media platforms and to identify the differences with similar structures in the traditional media. The automatic content analysis was used to gather the data about coverage of topics in different communicative spaces; the correlation analysis was used to identify correlations between top bloggers‟ focus on the topic and readers‟ responses on their posts, as well as attention of traditional media and attention of wider social media users to similar topics; the comparison method was used to detect differences between the fixed patterns from the same patterns in traditional media. The study shows that the audience‟s attention of top bloggers is formed by the principles that are entirely different from those in traditional media. While in both communicative spaces the readers‟ attention is defined by serial-structured media narrative, in the case of traditional media it is “serials” in fact: the reader first of all tracks “long” plotlines that are lasted for months and longer. In contrast of blog space, a reader tracks a media narrative in the format of “series”, focusing mainly on the short, event-based topics. This finding is important because this may indicate the specificity of media consumption of those part of audience that obtains the news just from social media. They more often consume information in fragments, focusing on debates related to the current topics without awareness of duration of political and economic processes, therefore it is easier to manipulate such an audience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信