马戈利斯对罗蒂和帕特南论战的现实主义论证

A. Kosarev
{"title":"马戈利斯对罗蒂和帕特南论战的现实主义论证","authors":"A. Kosarev","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J. Margolis suggested constructing a version of realism that would be based on the conceptual scheme, which take into account the problem of incommensurability and be compatible with relativism. The paper examines the arguments of Margolis, allowing him to construct a way to reconcile realism and relativism.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REALIST ARGUMENT BY J. MARGOLIS TO RORTY AND PATNAM POLEMIC\",\"authors\":\"A. Kosarev\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/S.2020.1.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"J. Margolis suggested constructing a version of realism that would be based on the conceptual scheme, which take into account the problem of incommensurability and be compatible with relativism. The paper examines the arguments of Margolis, allowing him to construct a way to reconcile realism and relativism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马戈利斯(J. Margolis)建议在考虑不可通约性问题并与相对主义相容的概念方案的基础上构建一种现实主义版本。本文考察了马戈利斯的论点,使他能够构建一种调和现实主义和相对主义的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
REALIST ARGUMENT BY J. MARGOLIS TO RORTY AND PATNAM POLEMIC
J. Margolis suggested constructing a version of realism that would be based on the conceptual scheme, which take into account the problem of incommensurability and be compatible with relativism. The paper examines the arguments of Margolis, allowing him to construct a way to reconcile realism and relativism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信