国际刑法:争论的焦点还是跨学科合作的机会?

M. La Manna
{"title":"国际刑法:争论的焦点还是跨学科合作的机会?","authors":"M. La Manna","doi":"10.1163/27725650-02020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe book review tackles Judge Aitala’s recently published International Criminal Law textbook and addresses its main features both against the background of existing textbooks and in light of the different conceptual and methodological toolkits used by international lawyers, on the one hand, and criminal lawyers, on the other, in their daily activities. It its purported that the two different groups should not think of icl as a bone of contention, but as an opportunity to cooperate and put to good use their respective knowledge and competence, instead.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Criminal Law: Bone of Contention or Interdisciplinary Cooperation Opportunity?\",\"authors\":\"M. La Manna\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725650-02020014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe book review tackles Judge Aitala’s recently published International Criminal Law textbook and addresses its main features both against the background of existing textbooks and in light of the different conceptual and methodological toolkits used by international lawyers, on the one hand, and criminal lawyers, on the other, in their daily activities. It its purported that the two different groups should not think of icl as a bone of contention, but as an opportunity to cooperate and put to good use their respective knowledge and competence, instead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书评讨论了Aitala法官最近出版的国际刑法教科书,并在现有教科书的背景下,根据国际律师和刑事律师在日常活动中使用的不同概念和方法工具包,论述了其主要特点。据称,这两个不同的群体不应该把icl视为争论的焦点,而应该把它视为合作的机会,并充分利用各自的知识和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Criminal Law: Bone of Contention or Interdisciplinary Cooperation Opportunity?
The book review tackles Judge Aitala’s recently published International Criminal Law textbook and addresses its main features both against the background of existing textbooks and in light of the different conceptual and methodological toolkits used by international lawyers, on the one hand, and criminal lawyers, on the other, in their daily activities. It its purported that the two different groups should not think of icl as a bone of contention, but as an opportunity to cooperate and put to good use their respective knowledge and competence, instead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信