组织承诺:两个教学和研究组织的比较研究

J. L. Falce, Renata Giacomin, Tomaz Antônio Chaves, Cristiana Fernandes de Muylder
{"title":"组织承诺:两个教学和研究组织的比较研究","authors":"J. L. Falce, Renata Giacomin, Tomaz Antônio Chaves, Cristiana Fernandes de Muylder","doi":"10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V20.4767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational commitment can be considered a strategic and decisive factor in organizations. This paper aims to describe and compare the configuration of organizational commitment in a Higher Technical Education Institution and a Teaching and Research Foundation, both from Minas Gerais. A questionnaire was used based on Allen & Meyer's (1990) commitment scale and at the end of the instrument four open questions to understand organizations' perceptions of commitment. The results showed that the affective basis has higher perception in the Teaching Institution in comparison to the Foundation that has the highest average in the calculative base. The low adherence of the affective commitment in the case of the Foundation can indicate problems that deserve attention of the management of people of this organization with a view to losses of personnel and discontinuity of services. It should be emphasized that the open questions contributed to the undressing of the diagnosis proposed by the questionnaire, indicating the reasons for the affective and calculative impairment perceived in the organizations. Implications, limitations and suggestions are discussed in the article.","PeriodicalId":288834,"journal":{"name":"Gestão & Planejamento","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprometimento organizacional: Estudo comparativo entre duas organizações de ensino e pesquisa\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Falce, Renata Giacomin, Tomaz Antônio Chaves, Cristiana Fernandes de Muylder\",\"doi\":\"10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V20.4767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizational commitment can be considered a strategic and decisive factor in organizations. This paper aims to describe and compare the configuration of organizational commitment in a Higher Technical Education Institution and a Teaching and Research Foundation, both from Minas Gerais. A questionnaire was used based on Allen & Meyer's (1990) commitment scale and at the end of the instrument four open questions to understand organizations' perceptions of commitment. The results showed that the affective basis has higher perception in the Teaching Institution in comparison to the Foundation that has the highest average in the calculative base. The low adherence of the affective commitment in the case of the Foundation can indicate problems that deserve attention of the management of people of this organization with a view to losses of personnel and discontinuity of services. It should be emphasized that the open questions contributed to the undressing of the diagnosis proposed by the questionnaire, indicating the reasons for the affective and calculative impairment perceived in the organizations. Implications, limitations and suggestions are discussed in the article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestão & Planejamento\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestão & Planejamento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V20.4767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestão & Planejamento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V20.4767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

组织承诺可以被认为是组织中的战略性和决定性因素。本文旨在描述和比较来自米纳斯吉拉斯州的高等技术教育机构和教学与研究基金会的组织承诺配置。在Allen & Meyer(1990)承诺量表的基础上,使用了一份问卷,并在问卷的最后提出了四个开放性问题,以了解组织对承诺的看法。结果表明,教学机构的情感基础比计算基础平均水平最高的基础具有更高的感知。在基金会的情况下,对情感承诺的遵守程度较低可能表明该组织的管理人员应注意的问题,以期造成人员损失和服务中断。应该强调的是,开放性问题有助于揭示问卷提出的诊断,表明在组织中感知到的情感和计算障碍的原因。本文讨论了影响、限制和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprometimento organizacional: Estudo comparativo entre duas organizações de ensino e pesquisa
Organizational commitment can be considered a strategic and decisive factor in organizations. This paper aims to describe and compare the configuration of organizational commitment in a Higher Technical Education Institution and a Teaching and Research Foundation, both from Minas Gerais. A questionnaire was used based on Allen & Meyer's (1990) commitment scale and at the end of the instrument four open questions to understand organizations' perceptions of commitment. The results showed that the affective basis has higher perception in the Teaching Institution in comparison to the Foundation that has the highest average in the calculative base. The low adherence of the affective commitment in the case of the Foundation can indicate problems that deserve attention of the management of people of this organization with a view to losses of personnel and discontinuity of services. It should be emphasized that the open questions contributed to the undressing of the diagnosis proposed by the questionnaire, indicating the reasons for the affective and calculative impairment perceived in the organizations. Implications, limitations and suggestions are discussed in the article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信