仲裁协议的书面效力

ضرغام اولاد محمد (امطير), DR Mohammad AL-ahmad
{"title":"仲裁协议的书面效力","authors":"ضرغام اولاد محمد (امطير), DR Mohammad AL-ahmad","doi":"10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration is one of the most important alternative means of dispute resolution because of its speed, flexibility and simplicity. The research aims to clarify the impact of writing on the permanence of the arbitration agreement if it is to be held and its impact if it is for proof. The research found a set of results, the most important of which is that the Palestinian Arbitration Law did not specify the legal value of writing whether it was for agreeing or proof, as the Palestinian judiciary went on to consider writing as a pillar of the  arbitration agreement. The study came up with a set of recommendations, the most important of which is to amend the text of article (5) of the Palestinian Arbitration Act by determining the legal value of writing in agreeing on arbitration clearly and explicitly as to whether it is for agreement or proof.","PeriodicalId":270369,"journal":{"name":"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of writing on the arbitration agreement\",\"authors\":\"ضرغام اولاد محمد (امطير), DR Mohammad AL-ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arbitration is one of the most important alternative means of dispute resolution because of its speed, flexibility and simplicity. The research aims to clarify the impact of writing on the permanence of the arbitration agreement if it is to be held and its impact if it is for proof. The research found a set of results, the most important of which is that the Palestinian Arbitration Law did not specify the legal value of writing whether it was for agreeing or proof, as the Palestinian judiciary went on to consider writing as a pillar of the  arbitration agreement. The study came up with a set of recommendations, the most important of which is to amend the text of article (5) of the Palestinian Arbitration Act by determining the legal value of writing in agreeing on arbitration clearly and explicitly as to whether it is for agreement or proof.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仲裁因其快速、灵活和简单而成为解决争议的最重要的替代手段之一。本研究的目的是澄清写作对仲裁协议的持久性的影响,如果它是为了证明,它的影响。研究发现了一系列结果,其中最重要的是,巴勒斯坦仲裁法没有明确规定书面形式的法律价值,无论是同意还是证明,因为巴勒斯坦司法机构继续将书面形式视为仲裁协议的支柱。这项研究提出了一套建议,其中最重要的是修正《巴勒斯坦仲裁法》第(5)条的案文,明确确定书面同意仲裁的法律价值,即书面是用于协议还是用于证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of writing on the arbitration agreement
Arbitration is one of the most important alternative means of dispute resolution because of its speed, flexibility and simplicity. The research aims to clarify the impact of writing on the permanence of the arbitration agreement if it is to be held and its impact if it is for proof. The research found a set of results, the most important of which is that the Palestinian Arbitration Law did not specify the legal value of writing whether it was for agreeing or proof, as the Palestinian judiciary went on to consider writing as a pillar of the  arbitration agreement. The study came up with a set of recommendations, the most important of which is to amend the text of article (5) of the Palestinian Arbitration Act by determining the legal value of writing in agreeing on arbitration clearly and explicitly as to whether it is for agreement or proof.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信