{"title":"通过Publons识别优秀同行审稿人的特征","authors":"Zhihong Huang, Qianjin Zong","doi":"10.1108/oir-11-2021-0604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aimed to identify the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons.com (an open and free online peer review website).Design/methodology/approachReviewers of the clinical medicine field on Publons were selected as the sample (n = 1,864). A logistic regression model was employed to examine the data.FindingsThe results revealed that reviewers' verified reviews, verified editor records, and whether they were the Publons mentors had significant and positive associations with excellent peer reviewers, while their research performance (including the number of articles indexed by Web of Science (WOS), citations, H-index and high-cited researcher), genders, words per review, number of current/past editorial boards, whether they had experiences of post-publication review on Publons and whether they were Publons academy graduates had no significant associations with excellent peer reviewers.Originality/valueThis study could help journals find excellent peer reviewers from free and open online platforms.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2021-0604.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons\",\"authors\":\"Zhihong Huang, Qianjin Zong\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/oir-11-2021-0604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aimed to identify the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons.com (an open and free online peer review website).Design/methodology/approachReviewers of the clinical medicine field on Publons were selected as the sample (n = 1,864). A logistic regression model was employed to examine the data.FindingsThe results revealed that reviewers' verified reviews, verified editor records, and whether they were the Publons mentors had significant and positive associations with excellent peer reviewers, while their research performance (including the number of articles indexed by Web of Science (WOS), citations, H-index and high-cited researcher), genders, words per review, number of current/past editorial boards, whether they had experiences of post-publication review on Publons and whether they were Publons academy graduates had no significant associations with excellent peer reviewers.Originality/valueThis study could help journals find excellent peer reviewers from free and open online platforms.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2021-0604.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Inf. Rev.\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Inf. Rev.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2021-0604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2021-0604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的本研究旨在利用开放、免费的在线同行评议网站Publons.com识别优秀同行评议者的特征。设计/方法学/方法选择pubons临床医学领域的审稿人作为样本(n = 1,864)。采用逻辑回归模型对数据进行检验。结果表明，审稿人的审稿验证、编辑记录验证、是否为Publons的导师与优秀同行审稿人存在显著正相关，而审稿人的研究绩效(包括Web of Science (WOS)索引文章数、被引次数、h指数和高被引研究员)、性别、审稿字数、现任/过去编辑委员会人数、他们是否有过Publons发表后评审的经历，以及他们是否是Publons学院的毕业生，与优秀的同行评审人员没有显著的联系。原创性/价值本研究可以帮助期刊从免费和开放的在线平台上找到优秀的同行审稿人。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2021-0604。
Identifying the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons
PurposeThis study aimed to identify the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons.com (an open and free online peer review website).Design/methodology/approachReviewers of the clinical medicine field on Publons were selected as the sample (n = 1,864). A logistic regression model was employed to examine the data.FindingsThe results revealed that reviewers' verified reviews, verified editor records, and whether they were the Publons mentors had significant and positive associations with excellent peer reviewers, while their research performance (including the number of articles indexed by Web of Science (WOS), citations, H-index and high-cited researcher), genders, words per review, number of current/past editorial boards, whether they had experiences of post-publication review on Publons and whether they were Publons academy graduates had no significant associations with excellent peer reviewers.Originality/valueThis study could help journals find excellent peer reviewers from free and open online platforms.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2021-0604.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
