坚韧的名声

Marco Serena, S. Barbieri
{"title":"坚韧的名声","authors":"Marco Serena, S. Barbieri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3935770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study reputation for toughness in finitely repeated contests. Players are rational (payoff-maximizing), or \"tough\" (always exerting an exogenous high \"tough effort\"). In the unique symmetric equilibrium, a rational player has strictly positive payoff only if she is monopolizing reputation. In a reputational oligopoly, a fierce war of attrition to become the reputational monopolist may yield overdissipation. In a reputational monopolist, overdissipation never happens and the monopolist mixes between a non-tough effort to cash in on her reputation today and the tough effort to boost her reputation. In our main application, criminal groups build reputation for toughness in illegal markets","PeriodicalId":373527,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reputation for Toughness\",\"authors\":\"Marco Serena, S. Barbieri\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3935770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study reputation for toughness in finitely repeated contests. Players are rational (payoff-maximizing), or \\\"tough\\\" (always exerting an exogenous high \\\"tough effort\\\"). In the unique symmetric equilibrium, a rational player has strictly positive payoff only if she is monopolizing reputation. In a reputational oligopoly, a fierce war of attrition to become the reputational monopolist may yield overdissipation. In a reputational monopolist, overdissipation never happens and the monopolist mixes between a non-tough effort to cash in on her reputation today and the tough effort to boost her reputation. In our main application, criminal groups build reputation for toughness in illegal markets\",\"PeriodicalId\":373527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3935770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3935770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究的是在有限次重复比赛中的坚韧度。玩家要么是理性的(收益最大化),要么是“强硬的”(总是施加外生的“强硬努力”)。在唯一对称均衡中,理性参与人只有在独占声誉时才有严格正收益。在声誉寡头垄断中,为成为声誉垄断者而进行的激烈消耗战可能会产生过度耗散。在声誉垄断者中,过度消耗永远不会发生,垄断者既会采取不强硬的措施来利用自己目前的声誉,也会采取强硬的措施来提升自己的声誉。在我们的主要应用中,犯罪集团在非法市场上以强硬著称
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reputation for Toughness
We study reputation for toughness in finitely repeated contests. Players are rational (payoff-maximizing), or "tough" (always exerting an exogenous high "tough effort"). In the unique symmetric equilibrium, a rational player has strictly positive payoff only if she is monopolizing reputation. In a reputational oligopoly, a fierce war of attrition to become the reputational monopolist may yield overdissipation. In a reputational monopolist, overdissipation never happens and the monopolist mixes between a non-tough effort to cash in on her reputation today and the tough effort to boost her reputation. In our main application, criminal groups build reputation for toughness in illegal markets
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信