液晶显示器易读性受字体和色彩对比的影响

G. Franken, Maruša Pangerc, K. Možina
{"title":"液晶显示器易读性受字体和色彩对比的影响","authors":"G. Franken, Maruša Pangerc, K. Možina","doi":"10.24867/GRID-2018-P67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evolution of high resolution displays, especially liquid crystal displays (LCD) that are among the most commonly used ones, has contributed to a larger circle of display readers. Despite high resolutions, problems in the legibility of typefaces still occur. Many typefaces may well be readable in print, but cause more difficulties when being read on displays. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of colour contrast on the legibility on LCDs to establish which type style is appropriate for a coloured text to be legible. Two different, specially designed typefaces for display use (one transitional, i.e. Georgia, and one sans-serif, i.e. Verdana) were tested in a satisfactory light-dark contrast of three different colour combinations involving five colours, i.e. dark grey (#1A1A1A) on white (#FFFFFF), dark blue (#142451) on light grey (#D9D9D9) and red (#C62026) on light grey. The reading speed and fixations were analysed with an eye-tracking device Tobii 120X. Different texts in both typefaces at 12 pt (16 px), in 130% leading and all colour combinations were displayed on a 24-inch LCD display. The forty tested individuals were between 19 and 22 years old. The results showed that the selection of a particular colour combination and contrast greatly affects the speed of reading and legibility. Less visible colour combinations of text and background were read more slowly than the more contrasting or visible ones at both typefaces. At both typefaces, it was seen that at a slower reading speed, more fixations were needed and vice-versa. It might also be concluded that the transitional typeface Georgia is more legible than the sans-serif typeface Verdana. Nevertheless, it appears that different colour combinations had different reading speeds at different typefaces (transitional vs sans-serif). An appropriate contrast and colour combination can facilitate legibility on displays.","PeriodicalId":371126,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LCD DISPLAY LEGIBILITY INFLUENCED BY TYPEFACES AND COLOUR CONTRASTS\",\"authors\":\"G. Franken, Maruša Pangerc, K. Možina\",\"doi\":\"10.24867/GRID-2018-P67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evolution of high resolution displays, especially liquid crystal displays (LCD) that are among the most commonly used ones, has contributed to a larger circle of display readers. Despite high resolutions, problems in the legibility of typefaces still occur. Many typefaces may well be readable in print, but cause more difficulties when being read on displays. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of colour contrast on the legibility on LCDs to establish which type style is appropriate for a coloured text to be legible. Two different, specially designed typefaces for display use (one transitional, i.e. Georgia, and one sans-serif, i.e. Verdana) were tested in a satisfactory light-dark contrast of three different colour combinations involving five colours, i.e. dark grey (#1A1A1A) on white (#FFFFFF), dark blue (#142451) on light grey (#D9D9D9) and red (#C62026) on light grey. The reading speed and fixations were analysed with an eye-tracking device Tobii 120X. Different texts in both typefaces at 12 pt (16 px), in 130% leading and all colour combinations were displayed on a 24-inch LCD display. The forty tested individuals were between 19 and 22 years old. The results showed that the selection of a particular colour combination and contrast greatly affects the speed of reading and legibility. Less visible colour combinations of text and background were read more slowly than the more contrasting or visible ones at both typefaces. At both typefaces, it was seen that at a slower reading speed, more fixations were needed and vice-versa. It might also be concluded that the transitional typeface Georgia is more legible than the sans-serif typeface Verdana. Nevertheless, it appears that different colour combinations had different reading speeds at different typefaces (transitional vs sans-serif). An appropriate contrast and colour combination can facilitate legibility on displays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2018-P67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2018-P67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

高分辨率显示器的发展,特别是液晶显示器(LCD)是最常用的显示器之一,使得显示阅读器的圈子更大。尽管分辨率很高,但字体的易读性仍然存在问题。许多字体在印刷时可能很好读,但在显示器上阅读时会遇到更多困难。本研究的目的是检查颜色对比对lcd易读性的影响,以确定哪种类型的风格适合彩色文本易读。两种不同的,专门设计用于显示的字体(一种过渡字体,如Georgia,一种无衬线字体,如Verdana)在三种不同的颜色组合中进行了令人满意的明暗对比测试,涉及五种颜色,即深灰色(#1A1A1A)在白色(#FFFFFF)上,深蓝色(#142451)在浅灰色(#D9D9D9)上,红色(#C62026)在浅灰色上。用Tobii 120X眼动追踪仪分析阅读速度和注视。在24英寸的液晶显示器上显示了两种字体的不同文本,字体字号为12字号(16像素),字体前导率为130%,所有颜色组合。接受测试的40个人年龄在19到22岁之间。结果表明,特定颜色组合和对比度的选择极大地影响了阅读速度和易读性。在两种字体中,较不明显的文字和背景颜色组合的阅读速度要慢于对比鲜明或明显的文字和背景。在两种字体中,阅读速度较慢时,需要更多的注视,反之亦然。也可以得出结论,过渡字体Georgia比无衬线字体Verdana更易读。然而,不同的颜色组合在不同的字体(过渡字体和无衬线字体)下有不同的阅读速度。适当的对比度和颜色组合可以提高显示器的可读性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LCD DISPLAY LEGIBILITY INFLUENCED BY TYPEFACES AND COLOUR CONTRASTS
The evolution of high resolution displays, especially liquid crystal displays (LCD) that are among the most commonly used ones, has contributed to a larger circle of display readers. Despite high resolutions, problems in the legibility of typefaces still occur. Many typefaces may well be readable in print, but cause more difficulties when being read on displays. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of colour contrast on the legibility on LCDs to establish which type style is appropriate for a coloured text to be legible. Two different, specially designed typefaces for display use (one transitional, i.e. Georgia, and one sans-serif, i.e. Verdana) were tested in a satisfactory light-dark contrast of three different colour combinations involving five colours, i.e. dark grey (#1A1A1A) on white (#FFFFFF), dark blue (#142451) on light grey (#D9D9D9) and red (#C62026) on light grey. The reading speed and fixations were analysed with an eye-tracking device Tobii 120X. Different texts in both typefaces at 12 pt (16 px), in 130% leading and all colour combinations were displayed on a 24-inch LCD display. The forty tested individuals were between 19 and 22 years old. The results showed that the selection of a particular colour combination and contrast greatly affects the speed of reading and legibility. Less visible colour combinations of text and background were read more slowly than the more contrasting or visible ones at both typefaces. At both typefaces, it was seen that at a slower reading speed, more fixations were needed and vice-versa. It might also be concluded that the transitional typeface Georgia is more legible than the sans-serif typeface Verdana. Nevertheless, it appears that different colour combinations had different reading speeds at different typefaces (transitional vs sans-serif). An appropriate contrast and colour combination can facilitate legibility on displays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信