用决策分析评价信息技术公共采购的性价比

Aron Larsson, Sam E. S. Dahlin, Mathias Astrom
{"title":"用决策分析评价信息技术公共采购的性价比","authors":"Aron Larsson, Sam E. S. Dahlin, Mathias Astrom","doi":"10.1145/3523132.3523133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In public procurement, byers typically try to resolve the problem of not knowing the tenders before stating their preferences through the use of price relative models or comparison prices and different procurements use slightly different spreadsheet models for tender evaluation. This renders it difficult to assess the quality attributes in a way enabling for evaluating and comparing price-quality properties of real-life tender evaluations. However, tender evaluation is an instance of multi-attribute decision-making, and for each tender evaluation instance there is a corresponding multi-attribute decision model enabling for a more systematic assessment of tender evaluations. In this paper, we investigate how robust the selection of tenders in IT procurement are towards changes in the assessment of quality and to the presence of quality attributes in the tender evaluation model. Conclusions include that “decisive” attributes cannot be expected to exist, and that score based tender evaluation model with precise estimates of quality levels put strong demands on the capabilities of the buyer.","PeriodicalId":109028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Europe)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Price-Quality Properties of Information Technology Public Procurement using Decision Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aron Larsson, Sam E. S. Dahlin, Mathias Astrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3523132.3523133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In public procurement, byers typically try to resolve the problem of not knowing the tenders before stating their preferences through the use of price relative models or comparison prices and different procurements use slightly different spreadsheet models for tender evaluation. This renders it difficult to assess the quality attributes in a way enabling for evaluating and comparing price-quality properties of real-life tender evaluations. However, tender evaluation is an instance of multi-attribute decision-making, and for each tender evaluation instance there is a corresponding multi-attribute decision model enabling for a more systematic assessment of tender evaluations. In this paper, we investigate how robust the selection of tenders in IT procurement are towards changes in the assessment of quality and to the presence of quality attributes in the tender evaluation model. Conclusions include that “decisive” attributes cannot be expected to exist, and that score based tender evaluation model with precise estimates of quality levels put strong demands on the capabilities of the buyer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Europe)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Europe)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3523132.3523133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3523132.3523133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公共采购中,购买者通常试图通过使用价格相对模型或比较价格来解决在陈述其偏好之前不了解标书的问题,不同的采购使用略有不同的电子表格模型进行评标。这使得很难以一种能够评估和比较实际投标评估的价格-质量特性的方式来评估质量属性。然而,评标是一个多属性决策的实例,每个评标实例都有一个相应的多属性决策模型,以便对评标进行更系统的评估。在本文中,我们研究了IT采购中的标书选择对质量评估的变化和标书评估模型中质量属性的存在的稳健程度。结论包括不能期望存在“决定性”属性,并且基于分数的投标评估模型对质量水平进行了精确估计,对买方的能力提出了强烈要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Price-Quality Properties of Information Technology Public Procurement using Decision Analysis
In public procurement, byers typically try to resolve the problem of not knowing the tenders before stating their preferences through the use of price relative models or comparison prices and different procurements use slightly different spreadsheet models for tender evaluation. This renders it difficult to assess the quality attributes in a way enabling for evaluating and comparing price-quality properties of real-life tender evaluations. However, tender evaluation is an instance of multi-attribute decision-making, and for each tender evaluation instance there is a corresponding multi-attribute decision model enabling for a more systematic assessment of tender evaluations. In this paper, we investigate how robust the selection of tenders in IT procurement are towards changes in the assessment of quality and to the presence of quality attributes in the tender evaluation model. Conclusions include that “decisive” attributes cannot be expected to exist, and that score based tender evaluation model with precise estimates of quality levels put strong demands on the capabilities of the buyer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信