alkasite型单增量牙釉质修复的边缘密封评价

Everton Ribeiro dos Santos, Lidiane de Souza Machado Colombo, Darlene Ribeiro dos Santos Gerzson, M. Cumerlato, Letiane de souza Machado, Alexandre da Silveira Gerzson
{"title":"alkasite型单增量牙釉质修复的边缘密封评价","authors":"Everton Ribeiro dos Santos, Lidiane de Souza Machado Colombo, Darlene Ribeiro dos Santos Gerzson, M. Cumerlato, Letiane de souza Machado, Alexandre da Silveira Gerzson","doi":"10.24077/2022;135102270100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The direct restoration technique is the most used to treat the sequelae of dental caries. With the constant evolution of dental materials, emerged in the dental market Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent), material belonging to the group of alkasite materials. This material has as proposal a higher mechanical resistance than the composite resin, with the similar color to the tooth and with good marginal sealing power. The present study aimed to compare the marginal infiltration of enamel in restorations using Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) with and without the use of adhesive and composite resin. Twenty one cavities were performed on the buccal surface of seven bovine incisor teeth. The cavities were divided into three groups: Group I - restoration with Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) without adhesive; Group II - restoration with Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) with adhesive; and Group III - adhesive system and vittra APS (FGM) resin. The collected data were submitted to the Anova statistical test in which the comparison between Groups I and II, II and III, and I and III was performed. In none of the cases a significant difference was found (p <0.05). Despite the limitations of an in vitro study, the results suggest that the marginal sealing of composite resin and alkasite do not differ significantly from each other.","PeriodicalId":108656,"journal":{"name":"Full Dentistry in Science","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avaliação de vedamento marginal de restaurações em esmalte em incremento único com material do tipo alkasite\",\"authors\":\"Everton Ribeiro dos Santos, Lidiane de Souza Machado Colombo, Darlene Ribeiro dos Santos Gerzson, M. Cumerlato, Letiane de souza Machado, Alexandre da Silveira Gerzson\",\"doi\":\"10.24077/2022;135102270100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The direct restoration technique is the most used to treat the sequelae of dental caries. With the constant evolution of dental materials, emerged in the dental market Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent), material belonging to the group of alkasite materials. This material has as proposal a higher mechanical resistance than the composite resin, with the similar color to the tooth and with good marginal sealing power. The present study aimed to compare the marginal infiltration of enamel in restorations using Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) with and without the use of adhesive and composite resin. Twenty one cavities were performed on the buccal surface of seven bovine incisor teeth. The cavities were divided into three groups: Group I - restoration with Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) without adhesive; Group II - restoration with Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) with adhesive; and Group III - adhesive system and vittra APS (FGM) resin. The collected data were submitted to the Anova statistical test in which the comparison between Groups I and II, II and III, and I and III was performed. In none of the cases a significant difference was found (p <0.05). Despite the limitations of an in vitro study, the results suggest that the marginal sealing of composite resin and alkasite do not differ significantly from each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Full Dentistry in Science\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Full Dentistry in Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24077/2022;135102270100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Full Dentistry in Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24077/2022;135102270100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接修复技术是治疗龋齿后遗症最常用的方法。随着牙科材料的不断演变,在牙科市场上出现了Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent),材料属于碱石材料组。该材料具有比复合树脂更高的机械阻力,与牙齿颜色相近,具有良好的边缘密封能力。本研究的目的是比较使用粘接剂和复合树脂与不使用粘接剂和复合树脂修复体时牙釉质边缘浸润的情况。对7颗牛切牙的颊面进行了21个空腔的修复。将牙槽分为三组:第一组:采用无粘接剂的Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent)修复;II组:用粘接剂修复n (Ivoclar Vivadent);第三组-胶粘剂体系和体外APS (FGM)树脂。收集到的数据进行Anova统计检验,对I组与II组、II组与III组、I组与III组进行比较。无显著性差异(p <0.05)。尽管体外研究存在局限性,但结果表明复合树脂和碱石矿的边缘密封性没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Avaliação de vedamento marginal de restaurações em esmalte em incremento único com material do tipo alkasite
The direct restoration technique is the most used to treat the sequelae of dental caries. With the constant evolution of dental materials, emerged in the dental market Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent), material belonging to the group of alkasite materials. This material has as proposal a higher mechanical resistance than the composite resin, with the similar color to the tooth and with good marginal sealing power. The present study aimed to compare the marginal infiltration of enamel in restorations using Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) with and without the use of adhesive and composite resin. Twenty one cavities were performed on the buccal surface of seven bovine incisor teeth. The cavities were divided into three groups: Group I - restoration with Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) without adhesive; Group II - restoration with Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent) with adhesive; and Group III - adhesive system and vittra APS (FGM) resin. The collected data were submitted to the Anova statistical test in which the comparison between Groups I and II, II and III, and I and III was performed. In none of the cases a significant difference was found (p <0.05). Despite the limitations of an in vitro study, the results suggest that the marginal sealing of composite resin and alkasite do not differ significantly from each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信