美国信托仲裁的立法途径

Lee-ford Tritt
{"title":"美国信托仲裁的立法途径","authors":"Lee-ford Tritt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2703989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, the treatment of mandatory arbitration provisions in trust agreements remains murky. This uncertainty may discourage estate planners from suggesting arbitration, even in cases where it would effectuate the settlor’s goals. A number of US state legislatures have already reformed their trust codes to make this area of law more predictable. Although it is impossible to predict the future, it seems likely that other US states will adopt similar provisions in the coming years and may thereby improve the way in which arbitration is used to resolve internal trust disputes. Therefore, this chapter explores the variety, validity, and viability of various legislative attempts to resolve the uncertainty surrounding mandatory arbitration of internal trust disputes. In so doing, the chapter provides a descriptive and normative analysis of various state legislative approaches regarding arbitration of trust disputes and critiques these efforts so as to help legislators going forward.","PeriodicalId":376950,"journal":{"name":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislative Approaches to Trust Arbitration in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Lee-ford Tritt\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2703989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, the treatment of mandatory arbitration provisions in trust agreements remains murky. This uncertainty may discourage estate planners from suggesting arbitration, even in cases where it would effectuate the settlor’s goals. A number of US state legislatures have already reformed their trust codes to make this area of law more predictable. Although it is impossible to predict the future, it seems likely that other US states will adopt similar provisions in the coming years and may thereby improve the way in which arbitration is used to resolve internal trust disputes. Therefore, this chapter explores the variety, validity, and viability of various legislative attempts to resolve the uncertainty surrounding mandatory arbitration of internal trust disputes. In so doing, the chapter provides a descriptive and normative analysis of various state legislative approaches regarding arbitration of trust disputes and critiques these efforts so as to help legislators going forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fiduciary Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"200 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fiduciary Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2703989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2703989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,信托协议中对强制性仲裁条款的处理仍然模糊不清。这种不确定性可能会使遗产规划人员不愿提出仲裁,即使在仲裁能够实现委托人目标的情况下也是如此。美国许多州的立法机构已经改革了它们的信托法规,以使这一法律领域更具可预测性。虽然无法预测未来,但美国其他州似乎很可能在未来几年内采用类似的规定,从而可能改善使用仲裁来解决内部信托纠纷的方式。因此,本章探讨了解决内部信托纠纷强制仲裁不确定性的各种立法尝试的多样性、有效性和可行性。在此过程中,本章对各州关于信托纠纷仲裁的立法方法进行了描述性和规范性的分析,并对这些努力进行了批评,以帮助立法者向前发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legislative Approaches to Trust Arbitration in the United States
In the United States, the treatment of mandatory arbitration provisions in trust agreements remains murky. This uncertainty may discourage estate planners from suggesting arbitration, even in cases where it would effectuate the settlor’s goals. A number of US state legislatures have already reformed their trust codes to make this area of law more predictable. Although it is impossible to predict the future, it seems likely that other US states will adopt similar provisions in the coming years and may thereby improve the way in which arbitration is used to resolve internal trust disputes. Therefore, this chapter explores the variety, validity, and viability of various legislative attempts to resolve the uncertainty surrounding mandatory arbitration of internal trust disputes. In so doing, the chapter provides a descriptive and normative analysis of various state legislative approaches regarding arbitration of trust disputes and critiques these efforts so as to help legislators going forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信