关系会计:女性薪酬谈判困境的答案

H. Bowles, Linda Babcock
{"title":"关系会计:女性薪酬谈判困境的答案","authors":"H. Bowles, Linda Babcock","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1296669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women face a compensation negotiation dilemma in which they have to weigh the economic benefits of asking for higher pay with the social risks of defying prescriptive sex stereotypes (Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007). In four experiments, we show that enhancing the legitimacy of women's compensation requests does not eliminate the social risk of asking, and that eliminating the social risk of asking is not sufficient to legitimize their requests. We identify strategies for overcoming the compensation negotiation dilemma using \"relational accounts\" that simultaneously explain why the negotiating behavior is appropriate under the circumstances and affirm concern for organizational relationships.","PeriodicalId":131091,"journal":{"name":"Negotiation Applications","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational Accounts: An Answer for Women to the Compensation Negotiation Dilemma\",\"authors\":\"H. Bowles, Linda Babcock\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1296669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women face a compensation negotiation dilemma in which they have to weigh the economic benefits of asking for higher pay with the social risks of defying prescriptive sex stereotypes (Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007). In four experiments, we show that enhancing the legitimacy of women's compensation requests does not eliminate the social risk of asking, and that eliminating the social risk of asking is not sufficient to legitimize their requests. We identify strategies for overcoming the compensation negotiation dilemma using \\\"relational accounts\\\" that simultaneously explain why the negotiating behavior is appropriate under the circumstances and affirm concern for organizational relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Negotiation Applications\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Negotiation Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1296669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiation Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1296669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

女性面临着薪酬谈判的两难境地,她们必须权衡要求更高薪酬的经济利益与违反规范性性别刻板印象的社会风险(Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007)。在四个实验中,我们发现提高女性薪酬要求的合法性并不能消除要求的社会风险,消除要求的社会风险也不足以使其要求合法化。我们确定了克服薪酬谈判困境的策略,使用“关系账户”,同时解释了为什么谈判行为在这种情况下是适当的,并肯定了对组织关系的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relational Accounts: An Answer for Women to the Compensation Negotiation Dilemma
Women face a compensation negotiation dilemma in which they have to weigh the economic benefits of asking for higher pay with the social risks of defying prescriptive sex stereotypes (Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007). In four experiments, we show that enhancing the legitimacy of women's compensation requests does not eliminate the social risk of asking, and that eliminating the social risk of asking is not sufficient to legitimize their requests. We identify strategies for overcoming the compensation negotiation dilemma using "relational accounts" that simultaneously explain why the negotiating behavior is appropriate under the circumstances and affirm concern for organizational relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信