对象的多重功能意义:基于支撑理论的研究

{"title":"对象的多重功能意义:基于支撑理论的研究","authors":"","doi":"10.51405/19.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term “object” for grammarians denotes: 1- What the “subject” has fallen on. 2-The\nresult of the conversion. 3- The “predicate” and the “ascribed to it” in the attribution\nindicating what the subject’s verb fell on. 4- Who participated in the action and other\nfunctions. Because of the multiplicity of functions of the “object”, its concept has\nbecome ambiguous among grammarians with other concepts such as “Mansob because\nof the deletion of the preposition”. This study seeks to find out the reason that prompted\nthe grammarians to launch the term “object” on all these functions despite their\ndifferences and to solve the problem of confusion in the concepts of the object with other\nconcepts, using the theory of “propping”, which is a modern ontological and\nepistemological theory that seeks to evaluate the foundations of science and solve its\nterminological problems.\nKeywords: Object, Multiplicity of functions, Theory of propping.","PeriodicalId":264644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Faculties of Arts","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Functional Significance of the Object: A Study in the Light of the Theory of Propping\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.51405/19.2.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term “object” for grammarians denotes: 1- What the “subject” has fallen on. 2-The\\nresult of the conversion. 3- The “predicate” and the “ascribed to it” in the attribution\\nindicating what the subject’s verb fell on. 4- Who participated in the action and other\\nfunctions. Because of the multiplicity of functions of the “object”, its concept has\\nbecome ambiguous among grammarians with other concepts such as “Mansob because\\nof the deletion of the preposition”. This study seeks to find out the reason that prompted\\nthe grammarians to launch the term “object” on all these functions despite their\\ndifferences and to solve the problem of confusion in the concepts of the object with other\\nconcepts, using the theory of “propping”, which is a modern ontological and\\nepistemological theory that seeks to evaluate the foundations of science and solve its\\nterminological problems.\\nKeywords: Object, Multiplicity of functions, Theory of propping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Faculties of Arts\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Faculties of Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51405/19.2.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Faculties of Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51405/19.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语法学家的“宾语”一词表示:1-“主语”落在什么地方。2 .转换的结果。定语中的“谓语”和“归因于它”,表示主语的动词落在什么地方。4-谁参与了行动和其他功能。由于“宾语”的功能的多样性,它的概念在语法学家中与其他概念(如“由于删除介词而导致的Mansob”)变得模糊。本研究试图找出促使语法学家在这些不同的功能上使用“对象”一词的原因,并利用“支撑”理论来解决对象概念与其他概念的混淆问题。“支撑”理论是一种现代本体论和存在论理论,旨在评价科学的基础并解决科学的术语问题。关键词:对象,函数的多重性,支撑理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple Functional Significance of the Object: A Study in the Light of the Theory of Propping
The term “object” for grammarians denotes: 1- What the “subject” has fallen on. 2-The result of the conversion. 3- The “predicate” and the “ascribed to it” in the attribution indicating what the subject’s verb fell on. 4- Who participated in the action and other functions. Because of the multiplicity of functions of the “object”, its concept has become ambiguous among grammarians with other concepts such as “Mansob because of the deletion of the preposition”. This study seeks to find out the reason that prompted the grammarians to launch the term “object” on all these functions despite their differences and to solve the problem of confusion in the concepts of the object with other concepts, using the theory of “propping”, which is a modern ontological and epistemological theory that seeks to evaluate the foundations of science and solve its terminological problems. Keywords: Object, Multiplicity of functions, Theory of propping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信