商业银行社会责任的评价指标体系研究 Rating System of the Social Responsibility of Commercial Banks in China

邓静
{"title":"商业银行社会责任的评价指标体系研究 Rating System of the Social Responsibility of Commercial Banks in China","authors":"邓静","doi":"10.12677/FIN.2018.86033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"本文借鉴企业社会责任层级理论将商业银行社会责任划分为经济、社会、环境三个维度,筛选关键观测点并利用层次分析法确定权重,尝试建立商业银行社会责任评价指标体系。作者以2014~2016年我国16家上市商业银行为样本,应用上述指标体系,对不同类型银行社会责任的履行结果进行比较。研究发现,国有控股商业银行社会责任表现稳定,在盈利和风险管控能力上表现突出;股份制商业银行由于经济规模、发展方向各异,在社会责任旅行方面表现出较大差异,其中民生银行和兴业银行分别在社会和环境责任领域表现突出,处于银行业领先水平;3家城市商业银行在样本期间发展迅猛,并具有地区发展优势,在社会和环境两个维度的表现均优于其他两类银行。 In this paper, the social responsibility of commercial banks is divided into three dimensions: eco-nomic, social and environmental. Selecting key points of observation and applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the index weights, we try to establish a rating system to evaluate the social responsibilities of commercial banks. In the empirical study, we selected all 16 listed commercial banks in China from 2014 to 2016 as our samples, and compared the perfor-mance of social responsibilities within different types of banks. We found that the state-controlled commercial banks showed stable performance and did best in profitability and risk management. Due to the different economic size and development direction, the social responsibility performance of joint-stock commercial banks varies. Among them, China Minsheng Bank and Industrial Bank performed well in the field of social and environmental responsibility separately, leading the banking industry. With the advantages of regional development, the three urban commercial bank samples developed rapidly and outperformed the other two types of banks in both social and en-vironmental dimensions.","PeriodicalId":251115,"journal":{"name":"The Finance","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"商业银行社会责任的评价指标体系研究 Rating System of the Social Responsibility of Commercial Banks in China\",\"authors\":\"邓静\",\"doi\":\"10.12677/FIN.2018.86033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"本文借鉴企业社会责任层级理论将商业银行社会责任划分为经济、社会、环境三个维度,筛选关键观测点并利用层次分析法确定权重,尝试建立商业银行社会责任评价指标体系。作者以2014~2016年我国16家上市商业银行为样本,应用上述指标体系,对不同类型银行社会责任的履行结果进行比较。研究发现,国有控股商业银行社会责任表现稳定,在盈利和风险管控能力上表现突出;股份制商业银行由于经济规模、发展方向各异,在社会责任旅行方面表现出较大差异,其中民生银行和兴业银行分别在社会和环境责任领域表现突出,处于银行业领先水平;3家城市商业银行在样本期间发展迅猛,并具有地区发展优势,在社会和环境两个维度的表现均优于其他两类银行。 In this paper, the social responsibility of commercial banks is divided into three dimensions: eco-nomic, social and environmental. Selecting key points of observation and applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the index weights, we try to establish a rating system to evaluate the social responsibilities of commercial banks. In the empirical study, we selected all 16 listed commercial banks in China from 2014 to 2016 as our samples, and compared the perfor-mance of social responsibilities within different types of banks. We found that the state-controlled commercial banks showed stable performance and did best in profitability and risk management. Due to the different economic size and development direction, the social responsibility performance of joint-stock commercial banks varies. Among them, China Minsheng Bank and Industrial Bank performed well in the field of social and environmental responsibility separately, leading the banking industry. With the advantages of regional development, the three urban commercial bank samples developed rapidly and outperformed the other two types of banks in both social and en-vironmental dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Finance\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2018.86033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2018.86033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文借鉴企业社会责任层级理论将商业银行社会责任划分为经济、社会、环境三个维度,筛选关键观测点并利用层次分析法确定权重,尝试建立商业银行社会责任评价指标体系。作者以2014~2016年我国16家上市商业银行为样本,应用上述指标体系,对不同类型银行社会责任的履行结果进行比较。研究发现,国有控股商业银行社会责任表现稳定,在盈利和风险管控能力上表现突出;股份制商业银行由于经济规模、发展方向各异,在社会责任旅行方面表现出较大差异,其中民生银行和兴业银行分别在社会和环境责任领域表现突出,处于银行业领先水平;3家城市商业银行在样本期间发展迅猛,并具有地区发展优势,在社会和环境两个维度的表现均优于其他两类银行。 In this paper, the social responsibility of commercial banks is divided into three dimensions: eco-nomic, social and environmental. Selecting key points of observation and applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the index weights, we try to establish a rating system to evaluate the social responsibilities of commercial banks. In the empirical study, we selected all 16 listed commercial banks in China from 2014 to 2016 as our samples, and compared the perfor-mance of social responsibilities within different types of banks. We found that the state-controlled commercial banks showed stable performance and did best in profitability and risk management. Due to the different economic size and development direction, the social responsibility performance of joint-stock commercial banks varies. Among them, China Minsheng Bank and Industrial Bank performed well in the field of social and environmental responsibility separately, leading the banking industry. With the advantages of regional development, the three urban commercial bank samples developed rapidly and outperformed the other two types of banks in both social and en-vironmental dimensions.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
商业银行社会责任的评价指标体系研究 Rating System of the Social Responsibility of Commercial Banks in China
本文借鉴企业社会责任层级理论将商业银行社会责任划分为经济、社会、环境三个维度,筛选关键观测点并利用层次分析法确定权重,尝试建立商业银行社会责任评价指标体系。作者以2014~2016年我国16家上市商业银行为样本,应用上述指标体系,对不同类型银行社会责任的履行结果进行比较。研究发现,国有控股商业银行社会责任表现稳定,在盈利和风险管控能力上表现突出;股份制商业银行由于经济规模、发展方向各异,在社会责任旅行方面表现出较大差异,其中民生银行和兴业银行分别在社会和环境责任领域表现突出,处于银行业领先水平;3家城市商业银行在样本期间发展迅猛,并具有地区发展优势,在社会和环境两个维度的表现均优于其他两类银行。 In this paper, the social responsibility of commercial banks is divided into three dimensions: eco-nomic, social and environmental. Selecting key points of observation and applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the index weights, we try to establish a rating system to evaluate the social responsibilities of commercial banks. In the empirical study, we selected all 16 listed commercial banks in China from 2014 to 2016 as our samples, and compared the perfor-mance of social responsibilities within different types of banks. We found that the state-controlled commercial banks showed stable performance and did best in profitability and risk management. Due to the different economic size and development direction, the social responsibility performance of joint-stock commercial banks varies. Among them, China Minsheng Bank and Industrial Bank performed well in the field of social and environmental responsibility separately, leading the banking industry. With the advantages of regional development, the three urban commercial bank samples developed rapidly and outperformed the other two types of banks in both social and en-vironmental dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信