比较苹果和苹果:不丹、印度和美国十年宪政经验

M. Peil
{"title":"比较苹果和苹果:不丹、印度和美国十年宪政经验","authors":"M. Peil","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3266300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observers of the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional experience too often fall into the trap of comparing it to its 21st century contemporaries, many of which have decades’ more experience in constitutional order. The author instead compares the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional democratic monarchy (2008-18) with those of the United States (1781-1791) and India (1949-1959), in hopes of establishing a better benchmark. This paper was originally published in the Bhutan Law Review, Volume X, 2018. Issued by the Bhutan National Legal Institute (BNLI).","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Apples and Apples: Ten Years of Constitutional Experience in Bhutan, India and the United States\",\"authors\":\"M. Peil\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3266300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Observers of the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional experience too often fall into the trap of comparing it to its 21st century contemporaries, many of which have decades’ more experience in constitutional order. The author instead compares the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional democratic monarchy (2008-18) with those of the United States (1781-1791) and India (1949-1959), in hopes of establishing a better benchmark. This paper was originally published in the Bhutan Law Review, Volume X, 2018. Issued by the Bhutan National Legal Institute (BNLI).\",\"PeriodicalId\":137430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

观察不丹前十年宪法经验的人常常会陷入将其与21世纪的同龄人进行比较的陷阱中,许多人在宪法秩序方面有几十年的经验。作者将不丹实行君主立宪制的前十年(2008-18年)与美国(1781-1791年)和印度(1949-1959年)进行了比较,希望能建立一个更好的基准。本文原载于《不丹法律评论》2018年第10期。由不丹国家法律研究所(BNLI)颁发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Apples and Apples: Ten Years of Constitutional Experience in Bhutan, India and the United States
Observers of the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional experience too often fall into the trap of comparing it to its 21st century contemporaries, many of which have decades’ more experience in constitutional order. The author instead compares the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional democratic monarchy (2008-18) with those of the United States (1781-1791) and India (1949-1959), in hopes of establishing a better benchmark. This paper was originally published in the Bhutan Law Review, Volume X, 2018. Issued by the Bhutan National Legal Institute (BNLI).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信