无线传感器网络约束应用协议的评估

W. Colitti, K. Steenhaut, Niccolo De Caro, B. Buta, V. Dobrota
{"title":"无线传感器网络约束应用协议的评估","authors":"W. Colitti, K. Steenhaut, Niccolo De Caro, B. Buta, V. Dobrota","doi":"10.1109/LANMAN.2011.6076934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) and IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy networks (RPL) have accelerated the integration of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and smart objects with the Internet. At the same time, the development of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) has made it possible to provide resource constrained devices with web service functionalities. CoAP is an HTTP like web transfer protocol able to extend the REpresentational State Transfer (REST) architecture to LoWPANs. The major difference between CoAP and HTTP is the different transport layer protocol (UDP instead of TCP) and the header compression which makes the packet size significantly smaller. This work provides an evaluation of CoAP compared to HTTP. The performance is evaluated in terms of mote's energy consumption and response time. The aim of the paper is to demonstrate, with a quantitative and qualitative analysis, that CoAP is more suited to REST based WSNs compared to HTTP. The results have been obtained by means of simulation as well as tests on real sensor motes.","PeriodicalId":340032,"journal":{"name":"2011 18th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"99","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of constrained application protocol for wireless sensor networks\",\"authors\":\"W. Colitti, K. Steenhaut, Niccolo De Caro, B. Buta, V. Dobrota\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LANMAN.2011.6076934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) and IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy networks (RPL) have accelerated the integration of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and smart objects with the Internet. At the same time, the development of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) has made it possible to provide resource constrained devices with web service functionalities. CoAP is an HTTP like web transfer protocol able to extend the REpresentational State Transfer (REST) architecture to LoWPANs. The major difference between CoAP and HTTP is the different transport layer protocol (UDP instead of TCP) and the header compression which makes the packet size significantly smaller. This work provides an evaluation of CoAP compared to HTTP. The performance is evaluated in terms of mote's energy consumption and response time. The aim of the paper is to demonstrate, with a quantitative and qualitative analysis, that CoAP is more suited to REST based WSNs compared to HTTP. The results have been obtained by means of simulation as well as tests on real sensor motes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 18th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"99\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 18th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN.2011.6076934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 18th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN.2011.6076934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

摘要

IPv6 over Low-power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN)和IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL)加速了无线传感器网络(wsn)和智能对象与互联网的融合。同时,受限应用协议(Constrained Application Protocol, CoAP)的发展使得向资源受限的设备提供web服务功能成为可能。CoAP是一种类似HTTP的web传输协议,能够将REpresentational State transfer (REST)架构扩展到lowpan。CoAP和HTTP之间的主要区别是不同的传输层协议(UDP而不是TCP)和报头压缩,这使得数据包大小显着变小。这项工作提供了与HTTP相比的CoAP评估。性能是根据mote的能耗和响应时间来评估的。本文的目的是通过定量和定性分析来证明,与HTTP相比,CoAP更适合基于REST的wsn。通过仿真和实际传感器数据的测试得到了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of constrained application protocol for wireless sensor networks
IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) and IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy networks (RPL) have accelerated the integration of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and smart objects with the Internet. At the same time, the development of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) has made it possible to provide resource constrained devices with web service functionalities. CoAP is an HTTP like web transfer protocol able to extend the REpresentational State Transfer (REST) architecture to LoWPANs. The major difference between CoAP and HTTP is the different transport layer protocol (UDP instead of TCP) and the header compression which makes the packet size significantly smaller. This work provides an evaluation of CoAP compared to HTTP. The performance is evaluated in terms of mote's energy consumption and response time. The aim of the paper is to demonstrate, with a quantitative and qualitative analysis, that CoAP is more suited to REST based WSNs compared to HTTP. The results have been obtained by means of simulation as well as tests on real sensor motes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信