如何通过用户研究来评估最小化冲突的任务调度程序

B. Kasi, A. Sarma
{"title":"如何通过用户研究来评估最小化冲突的任务调度程序","authors":"B. Kasi, A. Sarma","doi":"10.1109/USER.2013.6603078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workspace awareness tools facilitate coordination among developers in a team by informing them of emerging conflicts due to parallel development. Several such tools have been introduced recently. However, evaluating such (collaborative) tools through user studies is nontrivial because it depends on the group dynamics and their development behavior. In this paper, we present the challenges in evaluating a collaboration tool geared towards minimizing conflicts by scheduling (independent) development tasks. We present the research questions that a user evaluation should answer along with the foreseen challenges in answering these questions. We would like to use the workshop to exchange opinions and feedback to refine the design of our user study and start a conversation on the challenges and methods for evaluating a collaborative development tools.","PeriodicalId":319590,"journal":{"name":"2013 2nd International Workshop on User Evaluations for Software Engineering Researchers (USER)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to evaluate a conflict minimizing task scheduler through a user study\",\"authors\":\"B. Kasi, A. Sarma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/USER.2013.6603078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Workspace awareness tools facilitate coordination among developers in a team by informing them of emerging conflicts due to parallel development. Several such tools have been introduced recently. However, evaluating such (collaborative) tools through user studies is nontrivial because it depends on the group dynamics and their development behavior. In this paper, we present the challenges in evaluating a collaboration tool geared towards minimizing conflicts by scheduling (independent) development tasks. We present the research questions that a user evaluation should answer along with the foreseen challenges in answering these questions. We would like to use the workshop to exchange opinions and feedback to refine the design of our user study and start a conversation on the challenges and methods for evaluating a collaborative development tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 2nd International Workshop on User Evaluations for Software Engineering Researchers (USER)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 2nd International Workshop on User Evaluations for Software Engineering Researchers (USER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/USER.2013.6603078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 2nd International Workshop on User Evaluations for Software Engineering Researchers (USER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/USER.2013.6603078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

工作空间感知工具通过通知团队中开发人员由于并行开发而出现的冲突来促进团队中开发人员之间的协调。最近已经引入了几个这样的工具。然而,通过用户研究来评估这样的(协作)工具是非常重要的,因为它取决于群体动态和他们的开发行为。在本文中,我们提出了评估协作工具的挑战,通过调度(独立的)开发任务来最小化冲突。我们提出了用户评估应该回答的研究问题,以及在回答这些问题时所预见的挑战。我们希望利用研讨会来交换意见和反馈,以改进我们用户研究的设计,并就评估协作开发工具的挑战和方法展开对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to evaluate a conflict minimizing task scheduler through a user study
Workspace awareness tools facilitate coordination among developers in a team by informing them of emerging conflicts due to parallel development. Several such tools have been introduced recently. However, evaluating such (collaborative) tools through user studies is nontrivial because it depends on the group dynamics and their development behavior. In this paper, we present the challenges in evaluating a collaboration tool geared towards minimizing conflicts by scheduling (independent) development tasks. We present the research questions that a user evaluation should answer along with the foreseen challenges in answering these questions. We would like to use the workshop to exchange opinions and feedback to refine the design of our user study and start a conversation on the challenges and methods for evaluating a collaborative development tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信