S. Suhardi, Muhammad Siddik Hasibuan, Erwin Nasution, Ichsan Rafisyah
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DAN ANALYCTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DALAM MENENTUKAN REKOMENDASI SHUTTLECOCK BADMINTON TERBAIK","authors":"S. Suhardi, Muhammad Siddik Hasibuan, Erwin Nasution, Ichsan Rafisyah","doi":"10.30829/jistech.v6i2.11072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The choice of shuttlecock is very important in playing badminton. In determining the shuttlecock to play badminton generally only involves reasoning skills or choosing randomly. Determination of shutllecock recommendations is considered important because through this activity the quality of each brand can be known. The method used in the shuttlecock selection decision support system is using the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods which aim to compare SAW and AHP. The criteria used are feather material, cork material, speed, level of usage, and price. The decision support system is designed with the PHP programming language and MySQL database to test and determine the ranking of several available alternatives. Then the results obtained from the assessment using the SAW method as the main priority of Yonex Shuttlecock Aerosena 50 (code: S3) as the best shuttlecock, while with the AHP method the main priority was Shuttlecock Victore Master Ace (code: S13) as the best shuttlecock. The ranking of each method will be used as a consideration for badminton players in choosing the appropriate shuttlecock for use","PeriodicalId":142114,"journal":{"name":"JISTech (Journal of Islamic Science and Technology)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISTech (Journal of Islamic Science and Technology)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30829/jistech.v6i2.11072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

打羽毛球时,羽毛球的选择很重要。在决定打羽毛球时一般只涉及推理技巧或随机选择。确定毽子推荐值被认为很重要,因为通过这项活动可以了解每个品牌的质量。在毽子选择决策支持系统中使用的方法是简单加性权法和层次分析法,目的是对简单加性权法和层次分析法进行比较。使用的标准是羽毛材料,软木材料,速度,使用水平和价格。决策支持系统采用PHP编程语言和MySQL数据库进行设计,对几种备选方案进行测试和排序。然后以SAW法为主要优先级的评价结果为Yonex毽子Aerosena 50(代码:S3)为最佳毽子,以AHP法为主要优先级的评价结果为毽子Victore Master Ace(代码:S13)为最佳毽子。每种方法的排名将作为羽毛球运动员选择合适的羽毛球的考虑因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERBANDINGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DAN ANALYCTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DALAM MENENTUKAN REKOMENDASI SHUTTLECOCK BADMINTON TERBAIK
The choice of shuttlecock is very important in playing badminton. In determining the shuttlecock to play badminton generally only involves reasoning skills or choosing randomly. Determination of shutllecock recommendations is considered important because through this activity the quality of each brand can be known. The method used in the shuttlecock selection decision support system is using the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods which aim to compare SAW and AHP. The criteria used are feather material, cork material, speed, level of usage, and price. The decision support system is designed with the PHP programming language and MySQL database to test and determine the ranking of several available alternatives. Then the results obtained from the assessment using the SAW method as the main priority of Yonex Shuttlecock Aerosena 50 (code: S3) as the best shuttlecock, while with the AHP method the main priority was Shuttlecock Victore Master Ace (code: S13) as the best shuttlecock. The ranking of each method will be used as a consideration for badminton players in choosing the appropriate shuttlecock for use
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信