{"title":"基于不一致容忍度的完整性检查方法分类","authors":"H. Decker, D. Martinenghi","doi":"10.1145/1389449.1389474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We define and examine six classes of methods for integrity checking: case-based, compositional, relevance-based, simplification-based, total-integrity-dependent, and measure-based ones. Each, except the penultimate, corresponds to a particular form of inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency measures provide a new approach to integrity checking and inconsistency tolerance. For many methods, proofs or disproofs of their inconsistency tolerance become easier and more transparent by our classification. In general, a better understanding of inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking is achieved","PeriodicalId":248980,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying integrity checking methods with regard to inconsistency tolerance\",\"authors\":\"H. Decker, D. Martinenghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1389449.1389474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We define and examine six classes of methods for integrity checking: case-based, compositional, relevance-based, simplification-based, total-integrity-dependent, and measure-based ones. Each, except the penultimate, corresponds to a particular form of inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency measures provide a new approach to integrity checking and inconsistency tolerance. For many methods, proofs or disproofs of their inconsistency tolerance become easier and more transparent by our classification. In general, a better understanding of inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking is achieved\",\"PeriodicalId\":248980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1389449.1389474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1389449.1389474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classifying integrity checking methods with regard to inconsistency tolerance
We define and examine six classes of methods for integrity checking: case-based, compositional, relevance-based, simplification-based, total-integrity-dependent, and measure-based ones. Each, except the penultimate, corresponds to a particular form of inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency measures provide a new approach to integrity checking and inconsistency tolerance. For many methods, proofs or disproofs of their inconsistency tolerance become easier and more transparent by our classification. In general, a better understanding of inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking is achieved