基于不一致容忍度的完整性检查方法分类

H. Decker, D. Martinenghi
{"title":"基于不一致容忍度的完整性检查方法分类","authors":"H. Decker, D. Martinenghi","doi":"10.1145/1389449.1389474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We define and examine six classes of methods for integrity checking: case-based, compositional, relevance-based, simplification-based, total-integrity-dependent, and measure-based ones. Each, except the penultimate, corresponds to a particular form of inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency measures provide a new approach to integrity checking and inconsistency tolerance. For many methods, proofs or disproofs of their inconsistency tolerance become easier and more transparent by our classification. In general, a better understanding of inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking is achieved","PeriodicalId":248980,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying integrity checking methods with regard to inconsistency tolerance\",\"authors\":\"H. Decker, D. Martinenghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1389449.1389474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We define and examine six classes of methods for integrity checking: case-based, compositional, relevance-based, simplification-based, total-integrity-dependent, and measure-based ones. Each, except the penultimate, corresponds to a particular form of inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency measures provide a new approach to integrity checking and inconsistency tolerance. For many methods, proofs or disproofs of their inconsistency tolerance become easier and more transparent by our classification. In general, a better understanding of inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking is achieved\",\"PeriodicalId\":248980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1389449.1389474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1389449.1389474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

我们定义并研究了六类完整性检查方法:基于案例的、组合的、基于相关性的、基于简化的、依赖于整体完整性的和基于度量的。除了倒数第二项之外,每一项都对应于一种特定形式的不一致容忍。不一致度量为完整性检查和不一致容忍度提供了一种新的方法。对于许多方法,通过我们的分类,它们的不一致容忍度的证明或反证变得更加容易和透明。一般来说,可以更好地理解不一致容忍完整性检查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifying integrity checking methods with regard to inconsistency tolerance
We define and examine six classes of methods for integrity checking: case-based, compositional, relevance-based, simplification-based, total-integrity-dependent, and measure-based ones. Each, except the penultimate, corresponds to a particular form of inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency measures provide a new approach to integrity checking and inconsistency tolerance. For many methods, proofs or disproofs of their inconsistency tolerance become easier and more transparent by our classification. In general, a better understanding of inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking is achieved
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信