全高清电视和超高清电视应用中H.265和VP9编码效率的比较

Jan Kufa, T. Kratochvil
{"title":"全高清电视和超高清电视应用中H.265和VP9编码效率的比较","authors":"Jan Kufa, T. Kratochvil","doi":"10.1109/RADIOELEK.2015.7128999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a performance comparison of the two modern video coding standards H.265/HEVC and VP9. For such comparison, the latest available versions of codecs for encoding were used. Comparison is provided by set of objective quality metrics. Comparing of coding efficiency is evaluated for Full HDTV and also for Ultra HDTV. Results indicate a dominance of HEVC encoding algorithm in comparison to VP9 if bit rates are set to higher values. In low bitrates results are both codecs very balanced with small dominance of VP9.","PeriodicalId":193275,"journal":{"name":"2015 25th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of H.265 and VP9 coding efficiency for full HDTV and ultra HDTV applications\",\"authors\":\"Jan Kufa, T. Kratochvil\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADIOELEK.2015.7128999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a performance comparison of the two modern video coding standards H.265/HEVC and VP9. For such comparison, the latest available versions of codecs for encoding were used. Comparison is provided by set of objective quality metrics. Comparing of coding efficiency is evaluated for Full HDTV and also for Ultra HDTV. Results indicate a dominance of HEVC encoding algorithm in comparison to VP9 if bit rates are set to higher values. In low bitrates results are both codecs very balanced with small dominance of VP9.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 25th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA)\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 25th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADIOELEK.2015.7128999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 25th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADIOELEK.2015.7128999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

本文介绍了两种现代视频编码标准H.265/HEVC和VP9的性能比较。为了进行这种比较,我们使用了最新版本的编解码器进行编码。通过一组客观的质量度量来提供比较。比较了全高清电视和超高清电视的编码效率。结果表明,如果比特率设置为更高的值,HEVC编码算法与VP9相比具有优势。在低比特率的结果是两个编解码器非常平衡与小优势VP9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of H.265 and VP9 coding efficiency for full HDTV and ultra HDTV applications
This paper presents a performance comparison of the two modern video coding standards H.265/HEVC and VP9. For such comparison, the latest available versions of codecs for encoding were used. Comparison is provided by set of objective quality metrics. Comparing of coding efficiency is evaluated for Full HDTV and also for Ultra HDTV. Results indicate a dominance of HEVC encoding algorithm in comparison to VP9 if bit rates are set to higher values. In low bitrates results are both codecs very balanced with small dominance of VP9.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信