{"title":"凯恩斯主义的失败?","authors":"M. J. Oliver","doi":"10.4324/9780429431944-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two great merits of Keynes’ contribution to understanding an economy. The first was a return to analysing an economy in its aggregate, not at the level of individual consumer’s or firm’s behaviour or preferences. This meant that the fluctuations in a capitalist economy could be considered in their whole and not just ignored or dismissed. In other words, macroeconomics replaced microeconomics.","PeriodicalId":354357,"journal":{"name":"Whatever Happened to Monetarism?","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A failure of Keynesianism?\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429431944-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two great merits of Keynes’ contribution to understanding an economy. The first was a return to analysing an economy in its aggregate, not at the level of individual consumer’s or firm’s behaviour or preferences. This meant that the fluctuations in a capitalist economy could be considered in their whole and not just ignored or dismissed. In other words, macroeconomics replaced microeconomics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Whatever Happened to Monetarism?\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Whatever Happened to Monetarism?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431944-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whatever Happened to Monetarism?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431944-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
There are two great merits of Keynes’ contribution to understanding an economy. The first was a return to analysing an economy in its aggregate, not at the level of individual consumer’s or firm’s behaviour or preferences. This meant that the fluctuations in a capitalist economy could be considered in their whole and not just ignored or dismissed. In other words, macroeconomics replaced microeconomics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
