哈姆迪加工作中的南斯拉夫统一Kapidžić

M. Radušić
{"title":"哈姆迪加工作中的南斯拉夫统一Kapidžić","authors":"M. Radušić","doi":"10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses Hamdija Kapidžić’s study Bosna i Hercegovina u vrijeme \naustrougarske vladavine (članci i rasprave) [hereinafter: Bosnia and Herzegovina in the \nAustro-Hungarian period (Articles and Discussions)] in order to question the way in which \nthe socialist historiography of Bosnia and Herzegovina observed the Yugoslav unification \nin 1918, and the extent to which historical revisionism was present in that approach. The \nanalysis focuses on the scientific profile of researchers, relevance of sources, the connection \nbetween the source and the conclusion for the purpose of determining the extent to which \nKapidžić’s theses are scientifically founded and the extent to which they were a product of \nhistorical revisionism.","PeriodicalId":127816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yugoslav Unification in the Work of Hamdija Kapidžić\",\"authors\":\"M. Radušić\",\"doi\":\"10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses Hamdija Kapidžić’s study Bosna i Hercegovina u vrijeme \\naustrougarske vladavine (članci i rasprave) [hereinafter: Bosnia and Herzegovina in the \\nAustro-Hungarian period (Articles and Discussions)] in order to question the way in which \\nthe socialist historiography of Bosnia and Herzegovina observed the Yugoslav unification \\nin 1918, and the extent to which historical revisionism was present in that approach. The \\nanalysis focuses on the scientific profile of researchers, relevance of sources, the connection \\nbetween the source and the conclusion for the purpose of determining the extent to which \\nKapidžić’s theses are scientifically founded and the extent to which they were a product of \\nhistorical revisionism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文使用Hamdija Kapidžić的研究波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那u vrijeme austrougarske vladavine ( lanci i rasprave)[下称:奥匈帝国时期的波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(文章和讨论)],以质疑波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的社会主义史学观察1918年南斯拉夫统一的方式,以及历史修正主义在这种方法中存在的程度。分析的重点是研究人员的科学概况,来源的相关性,来源和结论之间的联系,以确定Kapidžić的论文在多大程度上是科学建立的,在多大程度上是历史修正主义的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yugoslav Unification in the Work of Hamdija Kapidžić
This paper uses Hamdija Kapidžić’s study Bosna i Hercegovina u vrijeme austrougarske vladavine (članci i rasprave) [hereinafter: Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Austro-Hungarian period (Articles and Discussions)] in order to question the way in which the socialist historiography of Bosnia and Herzegovina observed the Yugoslav unification in 1918, and the extent to which historical revisionism was present in that approach. The analysis focuses on the scientific profile of researchers, relevance of sources, the connection between the source and the conclusion for the purpose of determining the extent to which Kapidžić’s theses are scientifically founded and the extent to which they were a product of historical revisionism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信