{"title":"哈姆迪加工作中的南斯拉夫统一Kapidžić","authors":"M. Radušić","doi":"10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses Hamdija Kapidžić’s study Bosna i Hercegovina u vrijeme \naustrougarske vladavine (članci i rasprave) [hereinafter: Bosnia and Herzegovina in the \nAustro-Hungarian period (Articles and Discussions)] in order to question the way in which \nthe socialist historiography of Bosnia and Herzegovina observed the Yugoslav unification \nin 1918, and the extent to which historical revisionism was present in that approach. The \nanalysis focuses on the scientific profile of researchers, relevance of sources, the connection \nbetween the source and the conclusion for the purpose of determining the extent to which \nKapidžić’s theses are scientifically founded and the extent to which they were a product of \nhistorical revisionism.","PeriodicalId":127816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yugoslav Unification in the Work of Hamdija Kapidžić\",\"authors\":\"M. Radušić\",\"doi\":\"10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses Hamdija Kapidžić’s study Bosna i Hercegovina u vrijeme \\naustrougarske vladavine (članci i rasprave) [hereinafter: Bosnia and Herzegovina in the \\nAustro-Hungarian period (Articles and Discussions)] in order to question the way in which \\nthe socialist historiography of Bosnia and Herzegovina observed the Yugoslav unification \\nin 1918, and the extent to which historical revisionism was present in that approach. The \\nanalysis focuses on the scientific profile of researchers, relevance of sources, the connection \\nbetween the source and the conclusion for the purpose of determining the extent to which \\nKapidžić’s theses are scientifically founded and the extent to which they were a product of \\nhistorical revisionism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo (History, History of Art, Archeology) / Radovi (Historija, Historija umjetnosti, Arheologija), ISSN 2303-6974 on-line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46352/23036974.2020.2.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文使用Hamdija Kapidžić的研究波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那u vrijeme austrougarske vladavine ( lanci i rasprave)[下称:奥匈帝国时期的波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(文章和讨论)],以质疑波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的社会主义史学观察1918年南斯拉夫统一的方式,以及历史修正主义在这种方法中存在的程度。分析的重点是研究人员的科学概况,来源的相关性,来源和结论之间的联系,以确定Kapidžić的论文在多大程度上是科学建立的,在多大程度上是历史修正主义的产物。
Yugoslav Unification in the Work of Hamdija Kapidžić
This paper uses Hamdija Kapidžić’s study Bosna i Hercegovina u vrijeme
austrougarske vladavine (članci i rasprave) [hereinafter: Bosnia and Herzegovina in the
Austro-Hungarian period (Articles and Discussions)] in order to question the way in which
the socialist historiography of Bosnia and Herzegovina observed the Yugoslav unification
in 1918, and the extent to which historical revisionism was present in that approach. The
analysis focuses on the scientific profile of researchers, relevance of sources, the connection
between the source and the conclusion for the purpose of determining the extent to which
Kapidžić’s theses are scientifically founded and the extent to which they were a product of
historical revisionism.