基于恒模误差准则的三种盲均衡算法的比较

Tracie A. Schirtzinger, Xiaohui Li, W. Jenkins
{"title":"基于恒模误差准则的三种盲均衡算法的比较","authors":"Tracie A. Schirtzinger, Xiaohui Li, W. Jenkins","doi":"10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three constant modulus algorithms (CMA), the fast quasi-Newton CMA, the transform domain CMA, and the genetic search based CMA are proposed in this paper. The performances of these three algorithms are compared with each other via computer simulation. It is shown that the fast quasi-Newton CMA and the transform domain CMA achieve much faster convergence rate than the constant modulus algorithm based on the LMS algorithm. This fact shows that the whitening technique is not only useful but also necessary for the CMA.","PeriodicalId":300119,"journal":{"name":"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing","volume":"45 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of three algorithms for blind equalization based on the constant modulus error criterion\",\"authors\":\"Tracie A. Schirtzinger, Xiaohui Li, W. Jenkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three constant modulus algorithms (CMA), the fast quasi-Newton CMA, the transform domain CMA, and the genetic search based CMA are proposed in this paper. The performances of these three algorithms are compared with each other via computer simulation. It is shown that the fast quasi-Newton CMA and the transform domain CMA achieve much faster convergence rate than the constant modulus algorithm based on the LMS algorithm. This fact shows that the whitening technique is not only useful but also necessary for the CMA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"45 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

本文提出了三种常模算法:快速拟牛顿CMA、变换域CMA和基于遗传搜索的CMA。通过计算机仿真对三种算法的性能进行了比较。结果表明,快速拟牛顿CMA和变换域CMA的收敛速度比基于LMS算法的常模算法快得多。这一事实表明,美白技术不仅是有用的,而且是必要的CMA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of three algorithms for blind equalization based on the constant modulus error criterion
Three constant modulus algorithms (CMA), the fast quasi-Newton CMA, the transform domain CMA, and the genetic search based CMA are proposed in this paper. The performances of these three algorithms are compared with each other via computer simulation. It is shown that the fast quasi-Newton CMA and the transform domain CMA achieve much faster convergence rate than the constant modulus algorithm based on the LMS algorithm. This fact shows that the whitening technique is not only useful but also necessary for the CMA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信