过去的教训:为了更好的RFP,我们可以从古代和现代的修辞中学到什么

Debbie Davy
{"title":"过去的教训:为了更好的RFP,我们可以从古代和现代的修辞中学到什么","authors":"Debbie Davy","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public, broader public, and private sector companies communicate their needs for products and services to vendors through a formal Request for Proposal (RFP), and vendors compete for the opportunity to meet these needs through a formal RFP response. In order to understand the best way to approach crafting an effective RFP response, this article reviews the rhetorical theories of a representative sample of ancient and modern Western rhetoricians (Aristotle, Cicero, Bitzer, Bakhtin, Toulmin, Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Bacon and Hobbes) and then identifies best practices that can be leveraged by technical communication professionals.","PeriodicalId":404833,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from the past: What can be learned from ancient and modern rhetoric for a better RFP\",\"authors\":\"Debbie Davy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public, broader public, and private sector companies communicate their needs for products and services to vendors through a formal Request for Proposal (RFP), and vendors compete for the opportunity to meet these needs through a formal RFP response. In order to understand the best way to approach crafting an effective RFP response, this article reviews the rhetorical theories of a representative sample of ancient and modern Western rhetoricians (Aristotle, Cicero, Bitzer, Bakhtin, Toulmin, Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Bacon and Hobbes) and then identifies best practices that can be leveraged by technical communication professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

公共部门、更广泛的公共部门和私营部门的公司通过正式的请求提案(RFP)向供应商传达他们对产品和服务的需求,供应商通过正式的RFP响应来竞争满足这些需求的机会。为了了解制作有效RFP回应的最佳方法,本文回顾了古代和现代西方修辞学家(亚里士多德、西塞罗、比策尔、巴赫金、图尔敏、佩雷尔曼和奥尔布雷希茨-泰特卡、培根和霍布斯)的代表性修辞学理论,然后确定了技术交流专业人员可以利用的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons from the past: What can be learned from ancient and modern rhetoric for a better RFP
Public, broader public, and private sector companies communicate their needs for products and services to vendors through a formal Request for Proposal (RFP), and vendors compete for the opportunity to meet these needs through a formal RFP response. In order to understand the best way to approach crafting an effective RFP response, this article reviews the rhetorical theories of a representative sample of ancient and modern Western rhetoricians (Aristotle, Cicero, Bitzer, Bakhtin, Toulmin, Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Bacon and Hobbes) and then identifies best practices that can be leveraged by technical communication professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信