根除腐败委员会预防监测中心(MCP)监督政府内部监督机构的评估——以廖内省地方政府为例

Meri Putri Abadi
{"title":"根除腐败委员会预防监测中心(MCP)监督政府内部监督机构的评估——以廖内省地方政府为例","authors":"Meri Putri Abadi","doi":"10.34306/att.v5i2.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of the Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the supervision area of the Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) in the Riau Province area for the 2021 period, as well as input on strategies for improvement. The method used is a qualitative descriptive case study. Data processing is carried out through document analysis and interviews with regional inspectors in the Riau Province area. This study used the George Edward III model approach as an evaluation criterion. Four factors influence the successful implementation of policies/programs, namely communication, resources, disposition (disposition or attitude), and bureaucratic structure. The results of the 2021 MCP evaluation in the Riau Province area in the APIP area have been running with a score of 71%. The MCP improvement strategy needs to emphasize APIP competence and the independence of regional inspectorates. To strengthen the role of APIP, it is necessary to prepare special regulations related to the independence of the inspectorate in the regions that are MCP indicators / sub-indicators in the APIP area. The anomaly of corruption cases with MCP monitoring at the APIP level that is already running is still one of the elements of control activities, so there are many other factors to increase the MCP APIP area in efforts to eradicate corruption.","PeriodicalId":143921,"journal":{"name":"Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of the Corruption Eradication Commission's Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) in Overseeing the Government's Internal Supervision Apparatus: A Case Study of Riau Province's Local Governments\",\"authors\":\"Meri Putri Abadi\",\"doi\":\"10.34306/att.v5i2.305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of the Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the supervision area of the Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) in the Riau Province area for the 2021 period, as well as input on strategies for improvement. The method used is a qualitative descriptive case study. Data processing is carried out through document analysis and interviews with regional inspectors in the Riau Province area. This study used the George Edward III model approach as an evaluation criterion. Four factors influence the successful implementation of policies/programs, namely communication, resources, disposition (disposition or attitude), and bureaucratic structure. The results of the 2021 MCP evaluation in the Riau Province area in the APIP area have been running with a score of 71%. The MCP improvement strategy needs to emphasize APIP competence and the independence of regional inspectorates. To strengthen the role of APIP, it is necessary to prepare special regulations related to the independence of the inspectorate in the regions that are MCP indicators / sub-indicators in the APIP area. The anomaly of corruption cases with MCP monitoring at the APIP level that is already running is still one of the elements of control activities, so there are many other factors to increase the MCP APIP area in efforts to eradicate corruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i2.305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i2.305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估2021年期间根除腐败委员会预防监测中心(MCP)在廖内省政府内部监督机构(APIP)监督领域的实施情况,以及对改进战略的投入。所使用的方法是定性描述性案例研究。数据处理是通过文件分析和与廖内省地区区域视察员面谈进行的。本研究采用乔治·爱德华三世模型方法作为评价标准。影响政策/项目成功实施的四个因素是:沟通、资源、处置(处置或态度)和官僚结构。廖内省地区2021年MCP评估结果在APIP地区的得分为71%。MCP改进战略需要强调APIP的能力和区域检查员的独立性。为了加强APIP的作用,有必要在APIP区域的MCP指标/子指标区域制定与检查员独立性相关的特殊法规。在APIP层面进行MCP监控的腐败案件异常仍然是控制活动的要素之一,因此在根除腐败的努力中,还有许多其他因素需要增加MCP APIP领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of the Corruption Eradication Commission's Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) in Overseeing the Government's Internal Supervision Apparatus: A Case Study of Riau Province's Local Governments
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of the Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the supervision area of the Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) in the Riau Province area for the 2021 period, as well as input on strategies for improvement. The method used is a qualitative descriptive case study. Data processing is carried out through document analysis and interviews with regional inspectors in the Riau Province area. This study used the George Edward III model approach as an evaluation criterion. Four factors influence the successful implementation of policies/programs, namely communication, resources, disposition (disposition or attitude), and bureaucratic structure. The results of the 2021 MCP evaluation in the Riau Province area in the APIP area have been running with a score of 71%. The MCP improvement strategy needs to emphasize APIP competence and the independence of regional inspectorates. To strengthen the role of APIP, it is necessary to prepare special regulations related to the independence of the inspectorate in the regions that are MCP indicators / sub-indicators in the APIP area. The anomaly of corruption cases with MCP monitoring at the APIP level that is already running is still one of the elements of control activities, so there are many other factors to increase the MCP APIP area in efforts to eradicate corruption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信